1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)80033-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expandable stents (ES)/unusual locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This series also achieved a good clinical outcome (defined as the ability to eat or retain feeds without vomiting) in 80.6% of patients. The reported range of good clinical outcome is 80-100% [6,8,14,15,20]. The result of our series are in agreement with the above-stated numbers, with a technical success rate of 100% and initial clinical improvement of obstructive symptoms of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This series also achieved a good clinical outcome (defined as the ability to eat or retain feeds without vomiting) in 80.6% of patients. The reported range of good clinical outcome is 80-100% [6,8,14,15,20]. The result of our series are in agreement with the above-stated numbers, with a technical success rate of 100% and initial clinical improvement of obstructive symptoms of 100%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Two patients (10%) developed tumour ingrowth in our series and were successfully treated by further stenting. Other groups have described the use of lasers [25,26] to treat tumour ingrowth or the formation of palliative stomas [22] when obstructive symptoms reccur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-3 Stents have also recently been used in the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Although biliary and tracheal stents 4 have sometimes been used for this purpose, esophageal stents are preferred because their large diameter allows patients to eat regular food. However, stent placement in the stomach can be difficult because stents designed for the esophagus are short and soft, whereas the morphology of the stomach has much stronger curvature than the straight esophagus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stents used to relieve gastric outlet obstruction have primarily been Wall-stents, [8][9][10][11][12]14 although Z-stents [16][17][18] and Ultrafl ex stents [14][15][16][17][18][19] have also been used. Z-stents have a strong force of expansion but little fl exibility; Wall-stents have fl exibility, but a weak force of expansion and both ends are pointed, which presents other risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%