2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-007-9006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exotic Quantifiers, Complexity Classes, and Complete Problems

Abstract: We define new complexity classes in the Blum-Shub-Smale theory of computation over the reals, in the spirit of the polynomial hierarchy, with the help of infinitesimal and generic quantifiers. Basic topological properties of semialgebraic sets like boundedness, closedness, compactness, as well as the continuity of semialgebraic functions are shown to be complete in these new classes. All attempts to classify the complexity of these problems in terms of the previously studied complexity classes have failed. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results stand in contrast to the two-player setting, where the same decision problems are NP-complete [GZ89;CS08]. The class ∃R is the complexity class that captures the decision problem for the existential the-ory of the reals [SŠ17], or alternatively, is the constant-free Boolean part of the real analogue NP R in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation [BC09]. Clearly we have NP ⊆ ∃R, and from the decision procedure for the existential theory of the reals by Canny [Can88] it follows that ∃R ⊆ PSPACE.…”
Section: Hawk Dovementioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results stand in contrast to the two-player setting, where the same decision problems are NP-complete [GZ89;CS08]. The class ∃R is the complexity class that captures the decision problem for the existential the-ory of the reals [SŠ17], or alternatively, is the constant-free Boolean part of the real analogue NP R in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation [BC09]. Clearly we have NP ⊆ ∃R, and from the decision procedure for the existential theory of the reals by Canny [Can88] it follows that ∃R ⊆ PSPACE.…”
Section: Hawk Dovementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most prominently is the class BP(NP 0 R ) which also captures the complexity of the existential theory of the reals. It has been named ∃R by Schaefer and Štefankovič [SŠ17] as well as NPR by Bürgisser and Cucker [BC09]; we shall use the former notation ∃R. We further let ∀R = BP(coNP 0 R ) as well as…”
Section: Real Computational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results stand in contrast to the two-player setting, where the same decision problems are NP-complete [GZ89;CS08]. The class ∃R is the complexity class that captures the decision problem for the existential theory of the reals [SŠ17], or alternatively, is the constant free Boolean part of the real analogue NP R in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation [BC09]. Clearly we have NP ⊆ ∃R, and from the decision procedure for the existential theory of the reals by Canny [Can88] it follows that ∃R ⊆ PSPACE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Schaefer and Štefankovič [27] defined the complexity class ∃R as the closure of ETR under polynomial time many-one reductions. Alternatively, ∃R is equal to the constant-free Boolean part of the class NP R [8], which is the analogue class to NP in the Blum-Shub-Smale model of computation [4]. Clearly NP ⊆ ∃R and from the decision procedure by Canny [9] we have that ∃R ⊆ PSPACE.…”
Section: The Existential Theory Of the Realsmentioning
confidence: 99%