2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exosphere-mediated migration of volatile species on airless bodies across the solar system

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
(226 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both this work and [5] predict very low cold-trapping efficiency for Mercury due to its high irradiation; however, substantial ice deposits have been observed [7,15]. Because our model assumes constant water injection near the subsolar point for all scenarios, this neglects several processes and their subsequent consequences that deliver water to the planet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both this work and [5] predict very low cold-trapping efficiency for Mercury due to its high irradiation; however, substantial ice deposits have been observed [7,15]. Because our model assumes constant water injection near the subsolar point for all scenarios, this neglects several processes and their subsequent consequences that deliver water to the planet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Surprisingly, the Moon is perfectly sized for maximum water cold-trapping given its composition and proximity to the Sun.Surface-bound exospheres are very common in the solar system and they are therefore vital for understanding the volatile distribution on these airless bodies. Most studies of volatile transport in an exosphere focus on specific bodies such as the Moon [1-3], Ceres [4], and various outer solar system bodies [5]. There are few parametrical studies of exospheric modelling (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of deposition on Enceladus varies from ∼10 −6 to ∼10 −3 mm/yr near the equator (Southworth et al., 2019). Using a model for exospheres (Steckloff et al., 2022), and the thermal properties of Enceladus' surface (Howett et al., 2010), we compute the peak insolation‐driven sublimation rate on Enceladus (at the subsolar point), and find that the peak sublimation rate is on the order of ∼10 −20 mm/yr. Thus, accumulation of material on the surface likely dominates over sublimation driven morphologies near the equator on Enceladus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Callisto, the second largest moon of Jupiter and outermost of the Galilean satellites, contains numerous bright (i.e., high albedo) spires and ridge‐like structures that are proposed to be the result of sublimation/condensation of volatile materials (Howard & Moore, 2008; Moore et al., 1999; Steckloff et al., 2022; White et al., 2016). Qualitatively, this is consistent with the appearance of penitentes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, this lack of CO 2 ice on Miranda, where radiolytic production of CO 2 molecules should be possible, could result from its small mass and lower efficiency of retaining volatiles like CO 2 . Previous works have extensively discussed potential mechanisms for the production and destruction of CO 2 on the Uranian satellites, such as photolysis or sputtering by charged particles (Grundy et al 2006;Cartwright et al 2015;Sori et al 2017;Steckloff et al 2022). Most importantly, a large fraction of the expected thermal velocity distribution of sputtered or sublimated CO 2 molecules is greater than the escape velocity of Miranda (193 m s −1 ).…”
Section: Co 2 Icementioning
confidence: 99%