Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load

Abstract

The aim of this review was to provide an overview of assistive exoskeletons that have specifically been developed for industrial purposes and to assess the potential effect of these exoskeletons on reduction of physical loading on the body. The search resulted in 40 papers describing 26 different industrial exoskeletons, of which 19 were active (actuated) and 7 passive (non-actuated). For 13 exoskeletons, the effect on physical loading have been evaluated, mainly in terms of muscle activity. All passive exoskeletons retrieved were aimed to support the low back. 10 to 40% reductions in back muscle activity during dynamic lifting and static holding have been reported. Both lower body, trunk and upper body regions could benefit from active exoskeletons. Muscle activity reductions up to 80% have been reported as an effect of active exoskeletons. Exoskeletons have the potential to considerably reduce the underlying factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal injury. Practitioner SummaryWorldwide, a significant interest in industrial exoskeletons does exist, but a lack of specific safety standards and several technical issues hinder mainstay practical use of exoskeletons in industry. Specific issues include discomfort (for passive and active exoskeletons), weight of device, alignment with human anatomy and kinematics, and detection of human intention to enable smooth movement (for active exoskeletons).2

Spine-Inspired Continuum Soft Exoskeleton for Stoop Lifting Assistance

“…the distal disc n) at the shoulder brace. The pose transformation of the mechanism can be calculated by 2 ()…”

A research framework for the development and implementation of interventions preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders

“…In the previous decades there has been an increase in the number of studies regarding primary prevention of MSD, across a wide range of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology (29), applied physiology (30), biomechanics (31), physical and organizational (macro) ergonomics (25,32), behavioral sciences (33), production engineering (34), organizational management (35), health and business economics (36), and implementation science (37). These disciplines vary largely in their contribution to work-related MSD prevention research, ranging from classic injury surveillance and etiological studies to detailed laboratory studies and animal models exploring injury mechanisms, and studies evaluating interventions and implementation.…”

A review on intelligent wearables: Uses and risks

“…First, functioning as an extension of human bodies, the wearable devices are able to improve information presentation, management, and exchange, as well as enhance people's operational capabilities. For example, head‐mounted display devices including smart glasses can be used for remote guidance (Nee, Ong, Chryssolouris, & Mourtzis, ); exoskeletons can considerably reduce physical load on human bodies by enhancing their power (De Looze, Bosch, Krause, Stadler, & O'Sullivan, ; Khakurel et al, ). Second, just like its application in the clinical field, the ubiquitous nature of intelligent wearables enables them to continuously monitor employees' physical and psychological conditions, such as stress (Muaremi, Arnrich, & Tröster, ; Setz et al, ) and inappropriate joint angles which may lead to musculoskeletal disorders (Wang, Dai, & Ning, ; Yan, Li, Li, & Zhang, ).…”