2009
DOI: 10.1101/gr.093153.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exon-trapping mediated by the human retrotransposon SVA

Abstract: Although most human retrotransposons are inactive, both inactive and active retrotransposons drive genome evolution and may influence transcription through various mechanisms. In humans, three retrotransposon families are still active, but one of these, SVA, remains mysterious. Here we report the identification of a new subfamily of SVA, which apparently formed after an alternative splicing event where the first exon of the MAST2 gene spliced into an intronic SVA and subsequently retrotransposed. Additional ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
138
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
138
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In human, the human-specific exon of the SLC22A20 transporter gene overlaps with the edited SVA (SINE-R, VNTR and Alu) element at chr11:64762642-64764372 (build 36; Fig. 4c; see below on SVA) 37,38 . In this gene, editing introduced an adenosine at the nucleotide upstream of the 5′-splice site, modifying the 5′-splice site from the consensus G|GT 39 to A|GT (| indicates the exon-intron boundary).…”
Section: Identification Of Editing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human, the human-specific exon of the SLC22A20 transporter gene overlaps with the edited SVA (SINE-R, VNTR and Alu) element at chr11:64762642-64764372 (build 36; Fig. 4c; see below on SVA) 37,38 . In this gene, editing introduced an adenosine at the nucleotide upstream of the 5′-splice site, modifying the 5′-splice site from the consensus G|GT 39 to A|GT (| indicates the exon-intron boundary).…”
Section: Identification Of Editing Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transposable elements (TEs), despite long being thought of as junk DNA, have impacted the human genome during its evolution through a variety of mechanisms causing structural variations including insertional mutagenesis, generation of deletions at the insertion site, 3' or 5' transduction events, non-allelic homologous recombination and exonisation. [1][2][3][4] More than 10,000 TE insertions occurred in the human genome since human-chimpanzee divergence which were suggested to have implications on human evolution and especially its reproductive, cognitive and immune functions that diverged strongly during a relative short time period. 4,5 The large number of such TEs in the genome makes an analysis of their specific contribution to evolution very difficult, and previous studies highlighted the potential role of mainly self-propagating (L1, ERV/ETR) and Alu elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found 2 SVAinduced human-specific antisense transcripts. SVA elements are also actively amplified in the human genome (37,38). The 2 HERVs involved in the formation of novel antisense transcripts are of the HERVK subfamily which is an active HERV (35).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remaining cases, the inserted elements contribute a terminal exon (3 cases) or an internal exon (2 cases) to an existing antisense transcript. Addition of an exon cassette into and truncation of the transcripts are commonly induced by transposable elements (37,40,41).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation