2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-018-0673-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exome scale map of genetic alterations promoting metastasis in colorectal cancer

Abstract: BackgroundApproximately 90% of colorectal cancer (CRC) deaths are caused by tumors ability to migrate into the adjacent tissues and metastase into distant organs. More than 40 genes have been causally linked to the development of CRC but no mutations have been associated with metastasis yet. To identify molecular basis of CRC metastasis we performed whole-exome and genome-scale transcriptome sequencing of 7 liver metastases along with their matched primary tumours and normal tissue. Multiple, spatially separat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRC metastatic drivers are less clearly defined, apart from TP53 which is well characterised as being present in metastatic cancer 20 . Some studies have found mutations exclusive to metastatic sites 21 , 22 , whereas others found similar patterns of mutation between primary and metastasis 23 . Studies have examined the somatic mutations in CPM and their prognostic implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRC metastatic drivers are less clearly defined, apart from TP53 which is well characterised as being present in metastatic cancer 20 . Some studies have found mutations exclusive to metastatic sites 21 , 22 , whereas others found similar patterns of mutation between primary and metastasis 23 . Studies have examined the somatic mutations in CPM and their prognostic implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of mutations generally increases with age, and the combinations of these mutations occur in a nonrandom fashion (Welch et al , ). If the number of coding variants corresponds to the number of genes (Choi et al , ; Ng et al , ), then it is highly interesting that, on average, one variant can be expected per gene, which is also supported by data submitted in relation to exome sequencing of colorectal cancer (Goryca et al , ). Furthermore, very few nonsense mutations are generally found by sequencing (Choi et al , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the essential roles of genetic alterations and aberrant expressions of several oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes in the development of CRC ( 4 , 5 ). Whole-exome and genome-scale transcriptome sequencing of seven liver metastases, along with their matched primary tumors and normal tissues showed that, mutations in KRAS, APC, POLE, PTPRT, PLXND1, CELSR3, BAHD1 and PNPLA6 are associated with CRC metastasis ( 6 ). Several tumor suppressor genes are associated to CRC carcinogenic process, with the APC, PTEN, FBXW7 and p53 being the common mutated ones in CRC; while oncogenes, including KRAS, CDK8, BRAF, PIK3CA, EGFR, have been shown to have mutations in patients with CRC ( 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%