2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00981-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exome first approach to reduce diagnostic costs and time – retrospective analysis of 111 individuals with rare neurodevelopmental disorders

Abstract: This single-center study aims to determine the time, diagnostic procedure, and cost saving potential of early exome sequencing in a cohort of 111 individuals with genetically confirmed neurodevelopmental disorders. We retrospectively collected data regarding diagnostic time points and procedures from the individuals’ medical histories and developed criteria for classifying diagnostic procedures in terms of requirement, followed by a cost allocation. All genetic variants were re-evaluated according to ACMG reco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the bibliometric study carried out in this review, and the subsequent manual analyses, we found that exome sequencing was the most prevalent sequencing approach in the field, and that rare neoplastic diseases were the most prevalent clinical scenario. Exome sequencing continues to be a good starting point for the genetic diagnosis of RDs, as it provides a cost-effective and efficient way to identify disease-causing variants 20 . However, depending on the specific rare disease context, genome sequencing may be necessary to provide a complete diagnosis, including the analysis of non-coding variations, CNVs, or chromosomal rearrangements 21,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the bibliometric study carried out in this review, and the subsequent manual analyses, we found that exome sequencing was the most prevalent sequencing approach in the field, and that rare neoplastic diseases were the most prevalent clinical scenario. Exome sequencing continues to be a good starting point for the genetic diagnosis of RDs, as it provides a cost-effective and efficient way to identify disease-causing variants 20 . However, depending on the specific rare disease context, genome sequencing may be necessary to provide a complete diagnosis, including the analysis of non-coding variations, CNVs, or chromosomal rearrangements 21,22 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of NCDs with a high incidence rate among a population affects both public health and the healthcare system by affecting individuals’ productivity and increasing their absenteeism due to the disease itself and/or its consequences, such as emotional wellbeing or increasing the caregiver burden. Studies indicate that more than one-third of the healthcare system’s resources is spent on patients with genetic, chromosomal, or congenital disorders [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Consequences resulting from the increase in the number of individuals with lifetime health issues contradict the public health recommendation (No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity, with multiple nonspecific features, suggests a genetic-first approach; therefore, whole-exome sequencing (WES), which covers the entire coding sequence, is becoming the current standard of care [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The literature emphasizes the “exome first” approach as the first-line test in the diagnostic pathway of individuals with NDDs and/or epilepsy and highlights the accelerating impact on diagnostic time intervals and reduced costs [ 12 , 13 ]. The currently achievable diagnostic yield of WES in DEE S is 31–53% [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%