2012
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.193128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing as Clinical Tests: A Transformative Practice in Molecular Diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This level of yield is similar to or slightly higher than those of previous reports, either in research studies 1,[5][6][7] or clinical series reported by clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This level of yield is similar to or slightly higher than those of previous reports, either in research studies 1,[5][6][7] or clinical series reported by clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, for many genomic funding agencies and some researchers, adopting WGS into routine clinical care is an explicit aspiration. Indeed, WGS has been called a revolutionizing diagnostic tool [5],[6] that will have a profound impact on the practice of medicine [7]. While inexpensive and efficient, WGS is an impressive technological achievement, with the potential to serve as the foundation for new approaches to screening, diagnosis, risk prediction, and prognostic platforms in clinical practice; the actual impact it will have on health and health care systems is far from certain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 use of high-depth sequencing is particularly powerful in panel-based approaches in which the query region is small and great depths can be attained. In comparison, exome-and genome-sequencing efforts are complicated by the increased target region size and issues such as variable capture or sequencing efficiency, which collectively introduce regions of insufficient sequence depth and increase validation burden (27 ). Repetitive genomic re- gions and pseudogenes introduce alignment ambiguities due to the relatively short read lengths generated by most NGS technologies, and this represents another source of error (28 ).…”
Section: Alignment and Variant Detection (Secondary Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%