2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03767-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exogenous crimes and the assessment of public safety efficiency and effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopted the usual standard function shape by not considering indifference or preference thresholds during the elicitation process. Roc weights were used considering the four decision metrics resulted from Nepomuceno et al [5]: Pact for Life effectiveness in reducing 12% homicides (the most important criterion, w = 0,5208333), relative directional efficiency in violent crimes (CVLI, the second most important criterion, w = 0,2708333), relative directional efficiency in carjacking (the third most important criterion, w = 0,145833) and relative directional efficiency in street mugging (the least important criterion, w = 0,0625).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We adopted the usual standard function shape by not considering indifference or preference thresholds during the elicitation process. Roc weights were used considering the four decision metrics resulted from Nepomuceno et al [5]: Pact for Life effectiveness in reducing 12% homicides (the most important criterion, w = 0,5208333), relative directional efficiency in violent crimes (CVLI, the second most important criterion, w = 0,2708333), relative directional efficiency in carjacking (the third most important criterion, w = 0,145833) and relative directional efficiency in street mugging (the least important criterion, w = 0,0625).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranking police units under the influence of different environments, subjective value judgments, contexts and exogenous potentials of policing and criminality is challenging in the field of nonparametric efficiency analysis due to the stochastic nature of criminal occurrences. According to Nepomuceno et al [5], crime cannot be considered an input for or output from police departments' production system in the short-run because 1. it cannot be directly controlled (reduced), 2. stochastic characteristics (increasing police efficiency, e.g., by solving more cases and still having a more than proportional increase in crime), 3. influence of exogenous determinants (income, educational attainment, religious preference, population density, social status, age, a race and ethnicity, among others) which are neither in control nor can be coherently measured by police; 4. dependence and strict correlation with other results, 5. simultaneity bias and 6. impossibility to measure the number of crimes that have been prevented. The authors suggest using Nonparametric Robust Estimators [6,7,8], which account for extreme values in the data and permit measuring the effect of exogenous variables on the efficiency of Decision Making Units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different criminology theories, such as the Theory of Rational Choice of Gary Becker [ 32 ], the theory of routine activity of Cohen and Felson [ 33 ] and the Ostrom [ 34 ] and Nepomuceno et al [ 35 , 36 ] framework of crime determination highlight different perspectives for different types of crimes [ 37 ]. Thus, we limited our analysis to aggression-based data and misdemeanors where the offenders are motivated by a desire to commit the violent approach, and the victim is irrelevant (opportunistic victims).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When control variables are not included in such analysis, results might bias the distribution of inefficiencies. According to Nepomuceno et al [ 118 ], such analysis can jeopardize the objective measure of technical efficiency and the inclusion of exogenously determined outputs as non-discretionary inputs are suggested.…”
Section: Core Publications and Research Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%