2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exogenous and endogenous corticosterone alter feather quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
126
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, endogenous elevations of CORT via exposing birds to psychological or physical stressors have yielded mixed results. Psychological stressors had no effect on feather quality but European starlings subjected to food restriction grew feathers of lower mass in one study (Strochlic and Romero, 2008) and weaker feathers in a second (DesRochers et al, 2009). …”
Section: The Molecular Trade-off Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, endogenous elevations of CORT via exposing birds to psychological or physical stressors have yielded mixed results. Psychological stressors had no effect on feather quality but European starlings subjected to food restriction grew feathers of lower mass in one study (Strochlic and Romero, 2008) and weaker feathers in a second (DesRochers et al, 2009). …”
Section: The Molecular Trade-off Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The slower, less resource-intensive feather growth in rock doves may allow maintenance of the hormonal stress response, consistent with a protein-based trade-off (Romero and Wingfield, 2001). Subsequent experiments support this molecular trade-off hypothesis (DesRochers et al, 2009;Romero et al, 2005;Strochlic and Romero, 2008), though plausible alternatives such as energyor behavior-based trade-offs and more direct mechanistic hypotheses have not been formally considered. Behavioral, energetic or resource-based conflicts between maintenance processes such as molt and the stress response may have influenced the evolution of life cycle schedules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The tendency of the overlappers to lose more body condition over time suggests that the costs of the overlap were not fully compensated, even under the benign conditions of captivity. It is possible, however, that aspects of feather quality could have been compromised in overlappers, such as feather mass or structure (Dawson et al, 2000;DesRochers et al, 2009;De la Hera et al, 2010;Strochlic and Romero, 2008;Maenniste and Horak, 2011). Further characterizations of feather structural properties in relation to molt/breeding overlap are needed to resolve this question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of feather keratinization is strongly influenced by the initial amount and concentration of keratin monomers [67], which in turn is mostly limited by keratin gene transcription and mRNA abundance [68]. Given that keratin gene expression is regulated by various transcription factors that are highly responsive to extracellular condition and hormones [69], and keratinization itself is sensitive to the pH of the cellular environment [67], this crucial step in nanostructural organization is likely to be sensitive to, and therefore indicative of, developmental stressors and individual condition [70][71][72]. In summary, based on the timing and steps of the organization of colour-producing nanostructures, our evidence strongly opposes the suggestion that nanostructural organization results from active cellular processes, instead pointing to the role of energy-minimizing entropic interactions for achieving such patterns.…”
Section: Sexual Selection and The Evolution Of Iridescent Plumagementioning
confidence: 99%