2011
DOI: 10.1086/658243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exo-Earth/Super-Earth Yield of JWST Plus a Starshade External Occulter

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We estimate the exo-Earth/super-Earth yield of an imaging mission that combines the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) with a starshade external occulter under a realistic set of astrophysical assumptions. For the purpose of this study, we define "exo-Earth" and "super-Earth" as a planet of mass 1 to 2 M ⊕ and 2 to 10 M ⊕ , respectively, orbiting within the habitable zone (HZ) of a solar-type star. We show that for a survey strategy that relies on a single image as the basis for detection, roughly hal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is a key parameter for planning future space missions to directly image and measure the spectra of exo-Earths. Many mission concepts that have been studied could potentially succeed only if is large, at least 20% (Savransky, Kasdin, & Cady, 2010); (Catanzarite & Shao, 2011). A significantly smaller value of means that a mission to detect nearby Earths would have to be capable of searching 100 or more of the nearest stars instead of 10 or 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is a key parameter for planning future space missions to directly image and measure the spectra of exo-Earths. Many mission concepts that have been studied could potentially succeed only if is large, at least 20% (Savransky, Kasdin, & Cady, 2010); (Catanzarite & Shao, 2011). A significantly smaller value of means that a mission to detect nearby Earths would have to be capable of searching 100 or more of the nearest stars instead of 10 or 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inventory of confirmed exoplanets provided by the NASA Exoplanet Archive (Akeson et al 2013), extracted 2020 May 11, indicates that planets more massive than 0.5 Jupiter masses orbiting stars less massive than 0.5 solar masses comprise less than 2% of the total RV exoplanet discoveries. The architecture, exoplanet detection sensitivity, and prevalence of HZ planets in M-dwarf systems clearly play significant roles in calculations of occurrence rates of HZ terrestrial planets (Catanzarite & Shao 2011;Dressing & Charbonneau 2013;Gaidos 2013;Kopparapu 2013;Foreman-Mackey et al 2014;Dressing & Charbonneau 2015). The dynamics and prevalence of HZ terrestrial planets have yet to be as rigorously tested around solar-type stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocky planets like the Earth are 10 9 to 10 10 dimmer, in the visible, than their host stars; even in the thermal IR, where the contrast is lower, the luminosity ratio is still on the order of 10 7 . This barrier is expected to be broken with the advent the space telescope JWST (Charbonneau & Deming, 2007, Catanzarite & Shao 2011, with thermal IR capability, due for launch in 2018, and the groundbased E-ELT (Pantin, Salmon & Charnoz 2010, ESO 2011, capable of achieving a contras of 1:10 9 at 0.1 arcseconds, could observe super-Earth planets around the closest stars at thermal IR. Since the method described in this work does not put constraints on the planet´s radius, it would apply to hypothetical super-Earths in eccentric orbits that these two observatories might discover, provided that such planets have thin atmospheres (10 4 < χ < 10 5 mol m -2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%