2006
DOI: 10.1177/0193945905282301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exit Interview-Consultation for Research Validation and Dissemination

Abstract: Dissemination of research findings to practice and maintaining rigor and validity in qualitative research is a continuing challenge for nurse researchers. Using three nursing home case studies as examples, we describe how exit interview-consultation was used as: (1) a validation strategy, and; (2) as a rapid research dissemination tool that is particularly useful for nursing systems research. Through an exit interview-consultation method, researchers validated inferences made from qualitative and quantitative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 ''Member checks'' were completed at the end of each case study during an exit consultation interview, and in all cases participants confirmed the themes identified. 28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 ''Member checks'' were completed at the end of each case study during an exit consultation interview, and in all cases participants confirmed the themes identified. 28…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological soundness of qualitative research is evaluated by its rigor [2,5,[23][24][25]16] or trustworthiness, assessed by criteria of dependability, transferability, confirmability and credibility [26]. Credibility is considered the most important criterion, signifying that participants identify their own attributed meanings to the experience under study [1].…”
Section: The Methodological Aspects Of Member-check: Achieving Enhancmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,15]. The researchers then incorporates these reactions in the study findings [6,16,17]. Member-check is generally conducted at two stages of the study: first, when the participant is asked to review the interview transcription to confirm its accuracy before coding and analysis, e.g.…”
Section: Member-checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data triangulation included data collected from observation, interviews, and documents (Crabtree & Miller, 1999). At the end of each case study, the research team presented a summary of our findings to the participants as both an individual and organizational “member check” (Utley-Smith et al, 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%