Existing Accessible Modeling Tools Offer Limited Support to Evaluation of Impact Investment in Rangeland Ecosystem Services

Abstract

Privately owned rangelands in the western US support many ecosystem services and are threatened by financial incentives favoring conversion to housing development and more intensive forms of agriculture. Recognizing this threat, the impact investment community has identified rangeland management as a potential investing strategy to produce financial returns while preserving or enhancing the ecosystem services provided by intact rangelands. This strategy is based primarily on the notion that a capital-intensive conversion from continuous to rotational grazing can financially sustain rangelands through a combination of increased productivity and potentially monetized ecosystem service flows. The potential for these gains is supported by compelling anecdotal evidence, yet a robust body of scientific literature based on rigorous field experiments has not supported those claims, nor produced transferrable estimates of the benefits provided by rotational grazing of livestock (particularly cattle in the western US). Therefore, to demonstrate investment viability and measure investment success, impact investors will likely need to address these well-documented disconnects through some combination of monitoring and process-based modeling. This study examines the extent to which existing modeling tools are up to this task, by assessing the ability of two process-based models to represent four specific rotational grazing benefits put forth by impact investors, using a ranch in northeastern Wyoming as a case study. Using the Soil Water Assessment Tool, we simulated high magnitude changes in the water balance from surface runoff to evapotranspiration, which may be a benefit or negative impact depending on context (Benefit 1). We simulated a decrease in soil water storage under rotational grazing, which directly contradicts the outcome assumed in investment literature (Benefit 2). Using the InVEST beta Rangeland Production Model (based on the Century ecosystem model), we simulated increased biomass productivity (Benefit 3) under rotational grazing, which enhanced animal performance under some management parameters but negatively impacted it in others (Benefit 4). We conclude that the impact investing community will likely find greater success through a shift to objective-oriented ranch management, rather than a specific focus on rotation, and will also need additional investment in science and monitoring to demonstrate benefits.

Cultivating a greener plate: understanding consumer choices in the plant-based meat revolution for sustainable diets

“…It is anticipated that the worldwide market for PBMA will experience significant growth, with a predicted value of $85 billion (USD) by the year 2030 (Gordon et al, 2019). The promotion of PBMA is frequently advocated as a way to address the sustainability issues, animal welfare concerns, as well as in certain instances, public health issues linked to the farming and consumption of traditional meat.…”

Safety and Nutritional Risks Associated with Plant-Based Meat Alternatives

“…To achieve this in a cost-effective manner on a mass scale, the food industry must adeptly discern the right ingredient combinations and manufacturing processes to match the market trends. The projected growth for the global market for plant-based foods (primarily PBMAs and beverages) indicates an estimated value of USD 162 billion by 2030, a substantial increase from the USD 4.6 billion recorded in 2018 [9] and the USD 29.4 billion registered in 2020 [10]. These significant growth figures show a strong long-term outlook for investments in alternative proteins, despite their still small sector [11] and the fact that consumer demand is currently outpacing the industry's supply chain capabilities [12].…”