Existential provisions: The technopolitics of public infrastructure

Abstract

The paper provides a technopolitical analysis of public infrastructure by attending to the ways large technical systems became a political problem and how the development of infrastructure has inflected biopower, territoriality and security. It seeks to deepen the historical understanding of technopolitics by exploring the concept of Daseinsvorsorge (existential provision), which served as a crucial framework guiding public infrastructure provisions in Germany. Daseinsvorsorge provides a particularly revealing lens through which to examine questions of technopolitics, since it makes it possible to illuminate the dis/continuities in the government of infrastructure between three distinct political regimes: Nazi Germany, the post-war Federal Republic and contemporary Germany. The concept first became operative in post-war Germany, but it had emerged during the Third Reich in the work of Carl Schmitt’s disciple Ernst Forsthoff. Forsthoff identified steps towards Daseinsvorsorge in Nazi infrastructure planning, which was part and parcel of war mobilization, and borrowed tropes from the geopolitical imaginary of Nazi Germany like Lebensraum. After the war, Daseinsvorsorge aimed at establishing equal living conditions within Germany. With European integration and the privatization of infrastructure, the norms and forms of Daseinsvorsorge eroded without vanishing, since they surface in modified ways in EU guidelines and in critical infrastructure protection.

Toxic Space and Time: Slow Violence, Necropolitics, and Petrochemical Pollution

“…This study also builds on and extends the existing political ecology literature on oil, which has often discussed the shifting temporalities of petrochemicals (Limbert 2010;Rogers 2015;Huber 2017), as well as the material assemblages of chemical infrastructure (Appell 2012;Rodgers 2012;Rodgers and O'Neill 2012;Barry 2013;Larkin 2013;Appell, Mason, and Watts 2015;Landa 2016;Folkers 2017). Huber (2013), for example, drew attention to the unique temporality of fossil fuels, noting how they represent the biological compression of deep time.…”

“…And after a while you've got a full blown plant! Scholarship ranging from actor-network theory (Latour 1993) to new materialism (Bennett 2010) has highlighted the significance of infrastructures as political concerns (Appell 2012; Rodgers and O'Neill 2012;Barry 2013;Larkin 2013;Murphy 2013;Folkers 2017). Yet here, it is the oppressive nature of uncertain temporality that makes the material assemblages of petrochemical infrastructure an everyday concern.…”

Safe assemblages: thinking infrastructures beyond circulation in the times of SARS-CoV2

“…However, we suggest that security-related assemblages may not inevitably materialise as harbours of insecurity, but on the contrary, of security and safety. With respect to infrastructures, Andreas Folkers ( 2017 ) has argued that the general notion of modern infrastructures, and their tendency to overemphasise circulation, must be reconsidered in light of states’ practices of stockpiling, that is, the concentration and accumulation of material substances deemed vital for the safeguarding of society and the continuation of the state under conditions of anticipated crisis. The stockpiling of grain, fuel, water, medical equipment and medicines has been a key infrastructural ambition of modern states in order to provide for security and control in times of shortages caused by wars, natural disasters, economic downturns, or social unrest.…”

Money is data – the platformization of financial transactions

“…Financial infrastructures are deeply embedded into everyday lives and they have numerous political implications. In most countries they are part of what are termed 'critical infrastructures', which are supposed to survive even catastrophic events (Folkers, 2017). The 'critical' implications of payment infrastructures foreground their political relevance and show that their importance is far from being reducible to the financial sector.…”