“…And indeed in this case, as Allingham (1991) has demonstrated, equilibria are unique even when there is no riskless asset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…by Nielsen (1990), Allingham (1991), Dana (1999) and Hara (1998). For the case without a riskless asset under some additional assumptions Nielsen (1990), Allingham (1991) and Laitenberger (1998) give existence results. In any case, if there is an equilibrium, the next proposition shows that it features a lot of powerful properties.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, we will show in section 4 that even in the case when all investors exhibit constant absolute risk aversion, examples of economies with multiple equilibria can be constructed for the CAPM without a riskless asset. The only condition we know which guarantees uniqueness of equilibria even for the CAPM without a riskless asset has been given in Allingham (1991). When the CAPM utility functions are derived from expected utility maximization and when asset returns are normally distributed, then agents do not only exhibit constant absolute risk aversion but represented in a mean-variance diagram indifference curves are parallel straight lines.…”
In the standard CAPM with a riskless asset we give a sufficient condition for uniqueness.This condition is a joint restriction on the agents' endowments and their preferences which is compatible with non-increasing absolute risk aversion and which is in particular satisfied with constant absolute risk aversion. Moreover in the CAPM without a riskless asset we give an example for multiple equilibria even though all agents have constant absolute risk aversion.
“…And indeed in this case, as Allingham (1991) has demonstrated, equilibria are unique even when there is no riskless asset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…by Nielsen (1990), Allingham (1991), Dana (1999) and Hara (1998). For the case without a riskless asset under some additional assumptions Nielsen (1990), Allingham (1991) and Laitenberger (1998) give existence results. In any case, if there is an equilibrium, the next proposition shows that it features a lot of powerful properties.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, we will show in section 4 that even in the case when all investors exhibit constant absolute risk aversion, examples of economies with multiple equilibria can be constructed for the CAPM without a riskless asset. The only condition we know which guarantees uniqueness of equilibria even for the CAPM without a riskless asset has been given in Allingham (1991). When the CAPM utility functions are derived from expected utility maximization and when asset returns are normally distributed, then agents do not only exhibit constant absolute risk aversion but represented in a mean-variance diagram indifference curves are parallel straight lines.…”
In the standard CAPM with a riskless asset we give a sufficient condition for uniqueness.This condition is a joint restriction on the agents' endowments and their preferences which is compatible with non-increasing absolute risk aversion and which is in particular satisfied with constant absolute risk aversion. Moreover in the CAPM without a riskless asset we give an example for multiple equilibria even though all agents have constant absolute risk aversion.
“…In the CAPM world with only EU decision makers, the problem of existence of equilibria with positive prices is well-known (see Nielsen 1988;Allingham 1991;Nielsen 1992, andLevy 2007, among others). Exactly the same question arises in homogeneous CPT agents models, and the reason for negative prices is similar to that in the aforementioned papers.…”
This note identifies and fixes a minor gap in Proposition 1 in Barberis and Huang (Am Econ Rev 98(5):2066-2100, 2008. Assuming homogeneous cumulative prospect theory decision makers, we show that CAPM is a necessary (though not sufficient) condition that must hold in equilibrium. We support our results with numerical examples where security prices become negative.
“…The traditional approaches to equilibrium theory of commodity markets are not applicable to the CAPM with satiation portfolios either, because they exclude the case that satiation occurs only inside the set of feasible and individually rational allocations. Nielsen (1990) and Allingham (1991) investigate the existence of equilibrium in the classical capital asset pricing model without riskless assets. They assume that agents have homogeneous expectations on the return distribution.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.