2023
DOI: 10.3934/eect.2022032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and regularity in inverse source problem for fractional reaction-subdiffusion equation perturbed by locally Lipschitz sources

Abstract: <p style='text-indent:20px;'>In this paper, we consider an inverse problem of determining a space-dependent source in the time fractional reaction-subdiffusion equation involving locally Lipschitz perturbations, where the additional measurements take place at the terminal time which are allowed to be nonlinearly dependent on the state. By providing regularity estimates on both time and space of resolvent operator and using local estimates on Hilbert scales, we establish some results on the existence and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…$$ It is useful to notice that for each μ>0$$ \mu &gt;0 $$, the function sαfalse(t,μfalse)$$ {s}_{\alpha}\left(t,\mu \right) $$ is completely monotonic on false(0,false)$$ \left(0,\infty \right) $$, that is, false(1false)nntnsαfalse(t,μfalse)0,0.4emfor all0.4emn=0,1,2,,t>0,$$ {\left(-1\right)}&#x0005E;n\frac{\partial&#x0005E;n}{\partial {t}&#x0005E;n}{s}_{\alpha}\left(t,\mu \right)\ge 0,\kern0.4em \mathrm{for}\ \mathrm{all}\kern0.4em n&#x0003D;0,1,2,\dots, t&gt;0, $$ thanks to Gorenflo et al 42, Proposition 3.23, p. 47 (see also Pollard 43 ). We collect some useful other properties of sαfalse(·,μfalse),0.1emrαfalse(·,μfalse)$$ {s}_{\alpha}\left(\cdotp, \mu \right),{r}_{\alpha}\left(\cdotp, \mu \right) $$ in the following proposition whose proof can be borrowed from Tuan 44, Propositions 1 and 2 …”
Section: The Linear Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…$$ It is useful to notice that for each μ>0$$ \mu &gt;0 $$, the function sαfalse(t,μfalse)$$ {s}_{\alpha}\left(t,\mu \right) $$ is completely monotonic on false(0,false)$$ \left(0,\infty \right) $$, that is, false(1false)nntnsαfalse(t,μfalse)0,0.4emfor all0.4emn=0,1,2,,t>0,$$ {\left(-1\right)}&#x0005E;n\frac{\partial&#x0005E;n}{\partial {t}&#x0005E;n}{s}_{\alpha}\left(t,\mu \right)\ge 0,\kern0.4em \mathrm{for}\ \mathrm{all}\kern0.4em n&#x0003D;0,1,2,\dots, t&gt;0, $$ thanks to Gorenflo et al 42, Proposition 3.23, p. 47 (see also Pollard 43 ). We collect some useful other properties of sαfalse(·,μfalse),0.1emrαfalse(·,μfalse)$$ {s}_{\alpha}\left(\cdotp, \mu \right),{r}_{\alpha}\left(\cdotp, \mu \right) $$ in the following proposition whose proof can be borrowed from Tuan 44, Propositions 1 and 2 …”
Section: The Linear Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that scriptSαfalse(tfalse)$$ {\mathcal{S}}_{\alpha }(t) $$ given by () is a bounded linear operator on L2false(normalΩfalse)$$ {L}&#x0005E;2\left(\Omega \right) $$ for all t0$$ t\ge 0 $$. Some other interesting properties of scriptSαfalse(tfalse)$$ {\mathcal{S}}_{\alpha }(t) $$ are stated in the following lemma, whose proof can be found in Tuan 44, Lemma 2.1 …”
Section: The Linear Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%