2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-9659(01)00142-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and positivity of a system k-ε with a production term of the Rayleigh-Taylor type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence our analysis can handle compressible turbulent flows. The condition of the form (20) assumed for div u is much weaker than the corresponding assumption made in [15]. In dimension two, under the additional condition (A 1 ) we obtain in theorem 2 an existence result without any additional assumption of low compressibility.…”
Section: Discussion On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence our analysis can handle compressible turbulent flows. The condition of the form (20) assumed for div u is much weaker than the corresponding assumption made in [15]. In dimension two, under the additional condition (A 1 ) we obtain in theorem 2 an existence result without any additional assumption of low compressibility.…”
Section: Discussion On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Then the balance between the increase/decrease of the source terms of turbulence and the possible explosion/vanishing of the turbulent viscosities is difficult to control. Compared to previous works (see [16,15,23,28]) our basic assumption (A 0 ) made in theorem 1 is very general, and we remark that: i) We do not impose a free divergence condition on u and the mean density ρ is not supposed constant. Hence our analysis can handle compressible turbulent flows.…”
Section: Discussion On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Compared to previous works (see [1,7,12,13]) our basic assumption ( 0 ) made in Theorem 1 is very general. In particular, we do not artificially cancel the singularity in the model, and we only assume weak regularity on the data.…”
Section: Discussion On the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%