2024
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exhaustive identification of genome-wide binding events of transcriptional regulators

Anna Nordin,
Pierfrancesco Pagella,
Gianluca Zambanini
et al.

Abstract: Genome-wide binding assays aspire to map the complete binding pattern of gene regulators. Common practice relies on replication—duplicates or triplicates—and high stringency statistics to favor false negatives over false positives. Here we show that duplicates and triplicates of CUT&RUN are not sufficient to discover the entire activity of transcriptional regulators. We introduce ICEBERG (Increased Capture of Enrichment By Exhaustive Replicate aGgregation), a pipeline that harnesses large numbers of CUT&am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7b ). Past approaches such as ICEBERG, a pipeline that uses CUT&RUN replicates to create a combined profile of binding events for H3K4me3, have been previously used to uncover functionally relevant regulatory events 76 . However, our approach shows, for the first time, how chromatin deep learning models can be perturbed to uncover genome-wide and cell type-specific functionally and disease relevant regulatory regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7b ). Past approaches such as ICEBERG, a pipeline that uses CUT&RUN replicates to create a combined profile of binding events for H3K4me3, have been previously used to uncover functionally relevant regulatory events 76 . However, our approach shows, for the first time, how chromatin deep learning models can be perturbed to uncover genome-wide and cell type-specific functionally and disease relevant regulatory regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%