“…The former is suitable for expressing actual phenomena more precisely, , whereas the latter, which generally has a lighter calculation load and higher robustness for calculation stability, tends to have been preferred more in recent studies due to increasing needs for performance simulation in transient mode. − Limiting the scope to SHEVs, many investigations have focused on power control systems and fuel economy, whereas those focusing on emissions are scarce. Therefore, in our previous studies, we performed a vehicle test on a commercially produced SHEV and investigated the attributes of the engine emission. , Then, in terms of close-coupled TWCs (cc-TWCs), a numerical 1-D model that can achieve favorable reproducibility for light-off test results under a wide range of λ conditions, including amounts of byproducts (such as NH 3 and N 2 O), was built by introducing kinetic parameter control (KPC) along with λ. KPC is a control method that involves switching rate constants along with λ by providing two or three sets of kinetic parameters and λ threshold values to switch them for each global reaction. Essentially, although the rate constant must be immutable, it is nearly impossible to express the whole purification mechanism of TWCs with approximately 30 global reactions because they have not been elucidated sufficiently.…”