1956
DOI: 10.1159/000200580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exfoliative Cytology in Chronic Ulcerative Colitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third trial diagnostic series unsatisfactory material was obtained from only one case of proven carcinoma. This improvement reflects the much greater care which was taken with the preparation of the patient in this third series, and is in accord with the reports of others (Galambos and Klayman, 1955; Raskin and others, 1958). …”
Section: The Methods O F Collectingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the third trial diagnostic series unsatisfactory material was obtained from only one case of proven carcinoma. This improvement reflects the much greater care which was taken with the preparation of the patient in this third series, and is in accord with the reports of others (Galambos and Klayman, 1955; Raskin and others, 1958). …”
Section: The Methods O F Collectingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, care should be taken whenever cytological examination is performed in adnoma. In contrast, such very atypical cells as reported previously by Galambos et al (1956) and Boddington and Truelove (1956) appeared infrequently in ulcerative colitis in this series, while a great many of neutrophils together with multinucleated giant cells or plasma cells were characteristic of the active stage of ulcerative colitis (Watanabe et al 1977). Bemvenuti et al (1974) reported that 4 cases of cancer associated with ulcerative colitis were correctly diagnosed cytologically.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…These agents result in significant reparative changes greater than those easily recognizable as benign repair. The malignancy risk of cases assigned to the “atypical” category depends in part on the method for specimen procurement 2–15 . For specimens obtained by fine‐needle aspiration, malignancy risk of the “atypical” category is variable in published reports 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the term “atypical” has been used to imply that changes are present precluding a definitive diagnosis of benign but are associated with a low level of concern that a malignancy is present. The term “atypia” has been widely utilized in the analysis of gastrointestinal brushings and in this context has generally been associated with reactive changes associated with inflammation or repair 5–7 . Some authors have used the term “atypical squamous metaplasia” to describe metaplastic squamous epithelium with cellular or nuclear features of the same type but to lesser degree than those seen in squamous cell carcinoma 8 .…”
Section: Historical and Theoretical Basis For The Term “Atypical”mentioning
confidence: 99%