2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergetic analysis of a double stage LiBr–H2O thermal compressor cooled by air/water and driven by low grade heat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reddy et al [64] presented the exergetic performance of 50 MW solar power plant having parabolic dish Stirling engine and detected that the energy and exergy efficiencies of whole system were obtained to be 77.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Izquierdo et al [65] concluded after their study that the double stage system has about 22% less exergetic efficiency than the single effect one and 32% less exergetic efficiency than the double effect one. In another study, Izquierdo et al (2005) [66] observed that the exergetic efficiency of the double stage cycle considered was lower than that of the single and double effect cycles because it worked with heat at lower temperature.…”
Section: Exergetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reddy et al [64] presented the exergetic performance of 50 MW solar power plant having parabolic dish Stirling engine and detected that the energy and exergy efficiencies of whole system were obtained to be 77.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Izquierdo et al [65] concluded after their study that the double stage system has about 22% less exergetic efficiency than the single effect one and 32% less exergetic efficiency than the double effect one. In another study, Izquierdo et al (2005) [66] observed that the exergetic efficiency of the double stage cycle considered was lower than that of the single and double effect cycles because it worked with heat at lower temperature.…”
Section: Exergetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Izquierdo et al [65] concluded after their study that the double stage system has about 22% less exergetic efficiency than the single effect one and 32% less exergetic efficiency than the double effect one. In another study, Izquierdo et al (2005) [66] observed that the exergetic efficiency of the double stage cycle considered was lower than that of the single and double effect cycles because it worked with heat at lower temperature. The double stage system had about 22% less exergetic efficiency than the single effect one and 32% less exergetic efficiency than the double effect one.…”
Section: Exergetic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the heat source temperature is low, it is not possible to operate the single-effect cycle. Srikhirin et al [11] proposed a double-absorbing cooling cycle. The double-acting solution pump pressurizes the refrigerant at the outlet of the vaporizer twice, so that the system can produce a cooling capability at a lower temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several computer models for describing the performance characteristics of absorption chillers are shown in (Joudi and Lafta, 2001;Karamangil et al, 2010;Klomfar and Pátek, 2006;Lucas et al, 2004;Sumathy and Li, 2001). In addition, the use of the solar energy in an absorption heat pump system has been investigated (Assilzadeh et al, 2005;Balghouthi et al, 2005;Eicker and Pietruschka, 2009;Fan et al, 2007;He et al, 2009;Mazloumi et al, 2008).The exergy analysis of absorption cooling systems without solar collector is made by several authors (BenEzzine et al, 2005;Gebreslassie et al, 2010;Izquierdo et al, 2005;Talbi and Agnew, 2000;Ucar and Inalli, 2006). S.C. Kaushik and A. Arora (2009) present the exergy analysis and the effects of generator, absorber and evaporator temperatures on the energy and exergy performances of the single effect water-lithium bromide absorption system without solar collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%