2016
DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergaming for Health: A Randomized Study of Community-Based Exergaming Curriculum in Pediatric Weight Management

Abstract: Use of exergaming in community pediatric weight management did not improve weight status at the end of programming, and study implementation was limited by small sample and missing data. However, there were clinically promising trends in fitness, screen time, and caloric intake. Weight status of intervention participants did not rebound 6 months after programming. Larger, longer term studies are needed to establish the impact of videogaming interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three interventions showed no promise; 2 of these were targeting overweight and obesity, 1 was the exergaming plus classroom curriculum, and the other was motivational interviewing delivered via one-way text messaging [ 68 , 69 ]. Neither lead to improvements in behavioral outcomes (screen time, physical activity, and diet) or the primary outcome (BMI Z-scores) at 6 and 3 months, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three interventions showed no promise; 2 of these were targeting overweight and obesity, 1 was the exergaming plus classroom curriculum, and the other was motivational interviewing delivered via one-way text messaging [ 68 , 69 ]. Neither lead to improvements in behavioral outcomes (screen time, physical activity, and diet) or the primary outcome (BMI Z-scores) at 6 and 3 months, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed 38 distinct interventions across 69 published articles for the childhood developmental stage . We classified 37% of these as universal prevention, 26% as selective, and the remaining 37% as indicated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was variability in the overall quality scores of the different studies, with a range between 1 (Fernández-Rosado, 2013) [65] and 10 (Staiano, 2017) [61] between the lowest and highest scoring studies. Eleven studies [21,31,36,38,39,42,59,60,[63][64][65] scored below 8, and five studies [37,40,58,61,62] scored greater than or equal to 8 points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three discrepancies between the reviewers occurred. In the case of the assessment of the studies by Maddison et al (2011) [37] and Christison et al (2016), the discrepancies between the two reviewers in the dimension "withdrawals and dropouts" affected the score, so that it was agreed to use the numerical mean between the two quantitative scores and the qualitative rate for each rate was reported. In the case of the last discrepancy regarding Trost et al study (2013) study in the dimension "confounding", it did not affect the score or the qualitative rate of the dimension.…”
Section: Assessment Of Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%