Exercise type relates to inhibitory and error processing functions in older adults

Li, Dan; Huang, Chung Ju; Liu, Sin Chi; Chang, Kung Hung; Hung, Tsung Min

doi:10.1080/13825585.2018.1540688

Cited by 16 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fourteen studies were observational in design (Giglia et al, 2011; Dai et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013a, b; Huang C.J. et al, 2014; Jacobson and Matthaeus, 2014; Tsai and Wang, 2015; Guo et al, 2016; Tsai et al, 2016; Chang et al, 2017; Chueh et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017; Becker et al, 2018; Li et al, 2018) and five were intervention studies (Crova et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2015; O’Brien et al, 2017; Tsai et al, 2017; Hung et al, 2018). Based on the pretermined inclusion criteria, study selection was independently performed by two raters and the agreement score was 18 out of 19.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the 14 observational studies (Giglia et al, 2011; Dai et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013a, b; Huang C.J. et al, 2014; Jacobson and Matthaeus, 2014; Tsai and Wang, 2015; Guo et al, 2016; Tsai et al, 2016; Chang et al, 2017; Chueh et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017; Becker et al, 2018; Li et al, 2018), one involved children (Becker et al, 2018), seven involved young adults (Giglia et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2013a, b; Jacobson and Matthaeus, 2014; Chang et al, 2017; Chueh et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017), and six involved older adults (Dai et al, 2013; Huang C.J. et al, 2014; Tsai and Wang, 2015; Guo et al, 2016; Tsai et al, 2016; Li et al, 2018).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thirteen (Giglia et al, 2011; Dai et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013a, b; Huang C.J. et al, 2014; Jacobson and Matthaeus, 2014; Tsai and Wang, 2015; Guo et al, 2016; Tsai et al, 2016; Chang et al, 2017; Chueh et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2017; Li et al, 2018) of the 14 observational studies were found to be of “moderate quality” and one study (Becker et al, 2018) was judged to be of “high quality.” The rating scores are presented in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Exercise modes can be divided into open skill exercise (OSE) and closed skill exercise (CSE). While research has shown that these two exercise modes may have different effects on cognitive function, this possibility has not been systematically reviewed. Objective The purpose of the present review was to objectively evaluate the research literature regarding the effects of OSE versus CSE on cognitive function. Methods Six electronic databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception dates to December 2018 for studies examining the associations of OSE and CSE with cognitive function. The literature searches were conducted using the combinations of two groups of relevant search items related to exercise modes (i.e., OSE and CSE) and cognitive function. Articles were limited to human studies in all age groups. Both intervention and observational studies with full text published in English-language peer-reviewed journals were considered eligible. The search process, study selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment were carried out independently by two researchers. Results A total of 1,573 articles were identified. Fourteen observational and five intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. Twelve of the 14 observational studies found that OSE benefits cognitive function, and seven of these 14 observational studies supported superior effects of OSE compared with CSE for enhancing cognitive function. Three of the five intervention studies found that OSE (versus CSE) led to greater improvements in cognitive function in both children and older adults. Conclusion Although the majority of studies in this review were observational cross-sectional designs, the review tends to support that OSE is more effective for improving some aspects of cognitive function compared with CSE. More rigorous randomized control trials with long-term follow-ups are needed in order to confirm these differential cognitive effects of the two exercise modes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…jointly analyzed the selected articles. After excluding articles that did not meet our screening criteria, a total of 19 studies, including 15 cross-sectional studies [4,20,25,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] and 4 intervention studies [21,23,24,52] were selected for the analysis. The cross-sectional studies and intervention studies were analyzed separately.…”

Section: Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, when we refined cognitive performance, OSE produced better inhibition and cognitive flexibility than CSE. In two previous studies [43,50], event-related potential was used to compare OSE and CSE, and the former exhibited a better electrophysiological performance. These results are also consistent with the present findings.…”

Section: Differences In Cognitive Function Between Ose and Csementioning

confidence: 99%

Which Type of Exercise Is More Beneficial for Cognitive Function? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Open-Skill Exercise versus Closed-Skill Exercise among Children, Adults, and Elderly Populations

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A large number of studies have described a positive relationship between physical exercise and cognition. Physical exercise can be divided into closed-skill exercise (CSE) and open-skill exercise (OSE) based on the predictability of the performance environment. It remains unknown whether either of these types of exercise is more beneficial for cognitive function. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of OSE versus CSE on cognition. Eligible studies included cross-sectional studies and intervention studies that had a clear definition of OSE and CSE, and these were used to compare the cognitive performance differences between the two classes of exercise. A total of 15 cross-sectional studies and 4 intervention studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among the cross-sectional studies, the overall effect size for OSE versus CSE was 0.304 (95% confidence interval (CI) (−0.097, 1.213); p < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis showed that the overall effect size for OSE versus CSE was 0.247 for inhibition and 0.360 for cognitive flexibility (both p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant differences between the two exercise modes were observed in the intervention studies. In particular, there were no significant differences in visuospatial attention or in processing speed between the two exercise modes. Taken together, these results suggest that OSE is superior to CSE, especially for executive function, according to the 15 cross-sectional studies examined. However, data from the intervention studies indicate that OSE is not superior. Therefore, additional well-designed, long-term intervention studies are needed to elucidate the potential efficacy of OSE in all populations.

show abstract

The effects of negative air ions on cognitive function: an event-related potential (ERP) study

Chu

Chen

et al. 2019

Int J Biometeorol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exercise type relates to inhibitory and error processing functions in older adults

Cited by 16 publications

References 58 publications

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review

Which Type of Exercise Is More Beneficial for Cognitive Function? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Open-Skill Exercise versus Closed-Skill Exercise among Children, Adults, and Elderly Populations

The effects of negative air ions on cognitive function: an event-related potential (ERP) study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About