2019
DOI: 10.1017/s1478951519000312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise interventions for patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of recruitment, attrition, and exercise adherence rates

Abstract: PurposePatients with advanced cancer can experience debilitating physical symptoms, making participation in exercise programs difficult. This systematic review investigated the recruitment, adherence, and attrition rates of patients with advanced cancer participating in exercise interventions and examined components of exercise programs that may affect these rates.MethodsRelevant studies were identified in a systematic search of CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and EMBASE to December 2017. Two quality assessment tool… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
13
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our ndings, Morgan et al (41) identi ed program location as a barrier to participation and adherence, while Sheill et al (42) found that di culties travelling to exercise locations were a substantial barrier for individuals with advanced cancer. We found no evidence that the type of exercise program (i.e.,…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar to our ndings, Morgan et al (41) identi ed program location as a barrier to participation and adherence, while Sheill et al (42) found that di culties travelling to exercise locations were a substantial barrier for individuals with advanced cancer. We found no evidence that the type of exercise program (i.e.,…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, few studies have evaluated what patient-and program-factors predict adherence, and to our knowledge, none have evaluated the strength of this evidence using a standard framework such as GRADE. Similar to our ndings, Morgan et al (46) identi ed program location as a barrier to participation and adherence, while Sheill et al (47) found that di culties travelling to exercise locations were a substantial barrier for individuals with advanced cancer. We found no evidence that the type of exercise program (i.e., interval vs continuous exercise) was predictive of adherence, which is consistent with recommendations that the act of engaging in exercise is likely of greater importance than the speci c type of exercise performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found no evidence that the type of exercise program (i.e., interval vs continuous exercise) was predictive of adherence, which is consistent with recommendations that the act of engaging in exercise is likely of greater importance than the speci c type of exercise performed. (45,47) Some authors have advocated the identi cation of participant-level 'red ags' to adherence as a way to personalize exercise program design and support. (45) However, this approach requires a thorough understanding of what participant characteristics may act as red ags.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Brandao et al (2017) found that the average of attrition rate in the 34 studies was 22.88; SD=15.31 (Brandao et al, 2017). In addition, Sheill et al, (2019 conducted a systematic review, they reported that the average of attrition rate 24% (Sheill et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%