1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(95)00181-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise Intensity Does Not Effect Body Composition Change in Untrained, Moderately Overfat Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, our results for the ET group corroborate data from the literature, demonstrating mild but statistically significant changes in the main anthropometric and plasma markers of cardiac risk, in addition to the functional capacity as assessed by the aerobic capacity measured with AnT in relation to the controls [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As expected, our results for the ET group corroborate data from the literature, demonstrating mild but statistically significant changes in the main anthropometric and plasma markers of cardiac risk, in addition to the functional capacity as assessed by the aerobic capacity measured with AnT in relation to the controls [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[15][16][17][18][19] The impact of exercise intensity on change in body composition is equivocal. [20][21][22][23] Our results suggest that change in overall activity, but not change in any of the subcomponents of activity, is inversely associated with change in FM. This would then suggest that an increase in overall PA, regardless of the exercise intensity, might be an effective strategy to prevent FM gain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[15][16][17][18][19] One recent study has suggested a prospective association between PA and change in FM but this association was modified by age. 20 Furthermore, the potential impact of exercise intensity on change in BW and FM remains elusive, [21][22][23][24] and it is not known which if any of the subcomponents of free-living PA contributes more to change in BW and FM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 With regard to SSE, the FM and aerobic fitness response was typical of that reported in the literature in that there were no significant changes in TBM, FM or trunk fat, but there was a significant increase in aerobic fitness. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Central adiposity diminished in the HIIE compared to the SSE and CONT groups. The HIIE group decreased central abdominal fat by 9.5%, in contrast to the SSE group, which had a 10.5% increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%