Exercise-based rehabilitation for major non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings: a scoping review

Abstract

IntroductionWhile there is substantial evidence for the benefits of exercise-based rehabilitation in the prevention and management of non-communicable disease (NCD) in high-resource settings, it is not evident that these programmes can be effectively implemented in a low-resource setting (LRS). Correspondingly, it is unclear if similar benefits can be obtained. The objective of this scoping review was to summarise existing studies evaluating exercise-based rehabilitation, rehabilitation intervention characteristics and outcomes conducted in an LRS for patients with one (or more) of the major NCDs.MethodsThe following databases were searched from inception until October 2018: PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and trial registries. Studies on exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer or chronic respiratory disease conducted in an LRS were included. Data were extracted with respect to study design (eg, type, patient sample, context), rehabilitation characteristics (eg, delivery model, programme adaptations) and included outcome measures.ResultsThe search yielded 5930 unique citations of which 60 unique studies were included. Study populations included patients with cardiovascular disease (48.3%), diabetes (28.3%), respiratory disease (21.7%) and cancer (1.7%). Adaptations included transition to predominant patient-driven home-based rehabilitation, training of non-conventional health workers, integration of rehabilitation in community health centres, or triage based on contextual or patient factors. Uptake of adapted rehabilitation models was 54%, retention 78% and adherence 89%. The majority of the outcome measures included were related to body function (65.7%).ConclusionsThe scope of evidence suggests that adapted exercise-based rehabilitation programmes can be implemented in LRS. However, this scope of evidence originated largely from lower middle-income, urban settings and has mostly been conducted in an academic context which may hamper extrapolation of evidence to other LRS. Cost-benefits, impact on activity limitations and participation restrictions, and subsequent mortality and morbidity are grossly understudied.

Six-minute walk test protocol variations in low-resource settings – A scoping review

“…In line with previous research, a low-resource setting was defined as a low-income country (LIC) or lower-middle income country (LMIC) as per the World Bank Criteria, (World Bank 2018), or in the event of an UMIC or HIC, an explicit statement indicating a LRS (e.g. rural, minority populations, poverty) was required (Heine et al 2019).…”

Patient-Reported OUtcome measures in key African languages to promote Diversity in research and clinical practice (PROUD)—protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties

“…physical activity), or societal participation amongst others. Albeit used increasingly, in particular with the context of clinical trials, there have been repeated calls for the inclusion of the "patient's voice" in the realworld context during prospective data collection [5][6][7].…”

Systematic review of clinical effectiveness, components, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation in low-resource settings

“…In addition, PR services as developed in HICs may not be deliverable in the same format in LMICs 25,26 with substantial differences in resources, awareness, culture, healthcare configuration, and profile of diseases 27,28 , which may affect overall management strategy. The potential gains to individuals and healthcare economies, however, are large given the burden of disease in LMICs 29,30 .…”