2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.11145
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exemplar Guided Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation with Semantic Consistency

Abstract: Image-to-image translation has recently received significant attention due to advances in deep learning. Most works focus on learning either a one-to-one mapping in an unsupervised way or a many-to-many mapping in a supervised way. However, a more practical setting is many-to-many mapping in an unsupervised way, which is harder due to the lack of supervision and the complex inner-and cross-domain variations. To alleviate these issues, we propose the Exemplar Guided & Semantically Consistent Image-to-image Tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semantic segmentation in DG Based on the synthetic data such as GTAV [47] and SYNTHIA [49], numerous DA studies [43,60,53,6,69,18,58,37,65] have been proposed in semantic segmentation, but only a few DG studies [64,44] address semantic segmentation, as the majority of the DG methods mainly focused on image classification. DA, which can access the target domains, generally has better performance than DG, but DG methods that can handle an arbitrary unseen domain without access to the target domain are mandatory in the real world.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic segmentation in DG Based on the synthetic data such as GTAV [47] and SYNTHIA [49], numerous DA studies [43,60,53,6,69,18,58,37,65] have been proposed in semantic segmentation, but only a few DG studies [64,44] address semantic segmentation, as the majority of the DG methods mainly focused on image classification. DA, which can access the target domains, generally has better performance than DG, but DG methods that can handle an arbitrary unseen domain without access to the target domain are mandatory in the real world.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we collect domain-specific representations of each target image and assign pseudo domain labels by clustering (i.e., k-means clustering [17]). In this work, we assume that the latent domain of images is reflected in their style [16,19,27,15,4,37], and we thus use style information to cluster the compound target domain. In practice, we introduce hyperparameter K and divide the compound target domain T into a total of K latent domains by style, {T j } K j=1 .…”
Section: Discover: Multiple Latent Target Domains Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the scheme starts by discovering K latent domains in the compound target data [29] (discover). Motivated by the previous works [16,19,27,15,4,37] that utilizes style information as domain-specific representation, we propose to use latent target styles to cluster the compound target. Then, the scheme generates K target-like source domains by adopting an examplar-guided image translation network [5,42], hallucinating multiple latent target domains in source (hallucinate).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SemGAN includes an additional loss named consistency constraints along with existing GAN loss and cycle consistency loss. Exemplar guided unsupervised image to image translation with semantic consistency [21] uses feature masks to avoid the semantic inconsistency. This allows to transfer style information of the target image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%