Abstract:Background Previous research has explored executive functions (EFs) and adaptive behaviour in children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS), but there is a paucity of research on the relationship between the two in this population. This study aims to shed light on the profile of EFs and adaptive behaviour in DS, exploring the differences by age and investigating the relationship between these two domains. Method Parents/caregivers of 100 individuals with DS from 3 to 16 years old participated in the study. … Show more
“…Preschool and school‐age children varied somewhat in their EF profiles in the Onnivello et al . (2022) study, and greater EF challenges were reported by teachers relative to parents in the Csumitta et al . (2022) study.…”
Section: Executive Function In People With Intellectual Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the group-level profile seems to partially vary by factors like age and environmental context. Preschool and school-age children varied somewhat in their EF profiles in the Onnivello et al (2022) study, and greater EF challenges were reported by teachers relative to parents in the Csumitta et al (2022) study. These and other similar dimensions are important to consider when describing syndrome-related performances on the group level.…”
Section: Aetiology-specific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two manuscripts in this special issue examine EF in Down syndrome through proxy-report measures. Onnivello et al (2022) characterise caregiver-reported data from the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool (BRIEF-P, Gioia et al 2003) and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Second Edition (BRIEF 2; Gioia et al 2015) in children with Down syndrome and examine the relationship between caregiver-reported EF and adaptive behaviour. Csumitta et al (2022) compare EF proxy-report data from parents and teachers of children with Down syndrome using the BRIEF-2 (Gioia et al 2015).…”
Section: Aetiology-specific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of this approach is that proxy-report measures that were developed for the general population have been demonstrated to be appropriate for use in individuals with ID and retain their psychometric properties. Also, several papers in this special issue reach the conclusion that proxy-report measures used to assess EF in the general population, such as the BRIEF and its different forms, might are sensitive tools for identifying difficulties and profiles at least for some specific ID aetiologies such as Down and Williams syndrome (Csumitta et al 2022;Greiner de Magalhaes et al, 2022;Onnivello et al 2022). Using proxy-report measures has the advantage of eliminating the confounding factors of laboratory test and they increase ecological validity, but important issues arise when interpreting parent-report or teacher-report data.…”
Section: Measuring Executive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Onnivello et al . (2022) study described earlier focuses on the early phases of the lifespan in DS and examines the connection between EF and adaptive behaviour in preschool vs. school age children with DS. Although few connections were observed between these two domains in the preschoolers, a significant association between working memory and adaptive communication skills was reported.…”
Section: The Influence Of Executive Function On Other Domains Of Deve...mentioning
This editorial presents an introduction to and an overview of the current JIDR special issue on "Executive Function in Intellectual Disability." The articles included in this special issue provide a contemporary, in depth exploration of questions regarding the nature of EF in individuals with ID. Topics include the emergence of EF during early childhood in ID-related conditions, the influence of EF on other domains of development, and the relationship between EF and adaptation throughout the lifespan. This editorial synthesizes the findings presented in this special issue and identifies methodological challenges that researchers will continue to face in future investigations of this important area.
“…Preschool and school‐age children varied somewhat in their EF profiles in the Onnivello et al . (2022) study, and greater EF challenges were reported by teachers relative to parents in the Csumitta et al . (2022) study.…”
Section: Executive Function In People With Intellectual Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the group-level profile seems to partially vary by factors like age and environmental context. Preschool and school-age children varied somewhat in their EF profiles in the Onnivello et al (2022) study, and greater EF challenges were reported by teachers relative to parents in the Csumitta et al (2022) study. These and other similar dimensions are important to consider when describing syndrome-related performances on the group level.…”
Section: Aetiology-specific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Two manuscripts in this special issue examine EF in Down syndrome through proxy-report measures. Onnivello et al (2022) characterise caregiver-reported data from the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool (BRIEF-P, Gioia et al 2003) and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Second Edition (BRIEF 2; Gioia et al 2015) in children with Down syndrome and examine the relationship between caregiver-reported EF and adaptive behaviour. Csumitta et al (2022) compare EF proxy-report data from parents and teachers of children with Down syndrome using the BRIEF-2 (Gioia et al 2015).…”
Section: Aetiology-specific Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of this approach is that proxy-report measures that were developed for the general population have been demonstrated to be appropriate for use in individuals with ID and retain their psychometric properties. Also, several papers in this special issue reach the conclusion that proxy-report measures used to assess EF in the general population, such as the BRIEF and its different forms, might are sensitive tools for identifying difficulties and profiles at least for some specific ID aetiologies such as Down and Williams syndrome (Csumitta et al 2022;Greiner de Magalhaes et al, 2022;Onnivello et al 2022). Using proxy-report measures has the advantage of eliminating the confounding factors of laboratory test and they increase ecological validity, but important issues arise when interpreting parent-report or teacher-report data.…”
Section: Measuring Executive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Onnivello et al . (2022) study described earlier focuses on the early phases of the lifespan in DS and examines the connection between EF and adaptive behaviour in preschool vs. school age children with DS. Although few connections were observed between these two domains in the preschoolers, a significant association between working memory and adaptive communication skills was reported.…”
Section: The Influence Of Executive Function On Other Domains Of Deve...mentioning
This editorial presents an introduction to and an overview of the current JIDR special issue on "Executive Function in Intellectual Disability." The articles included in this special issue provide a contemporary, in depth exploration of questions regarding the nature of EF in individuals with ID. Topics include the emergence of EF during early childhood in ID-related conditions, the influence of EF on other domains of development, and the relationship between EF and adaptation throughout the lifespan. This editorial synthesizes the findings presented in this special issue and identifies methodological challenges that researchers will continue to face in future investigations of this important area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.