2007
DOI: 10.1080/00207450701239350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Functioning Skills in Male Students With Social-Emotional Disorders

Abstract: This study examined the efficacy of discrete versus global measures of executive functioning in children with different levels of emotional conditions. Fifty-seven male students were administered the Wisconsin Card Sort Test, the Category Test, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF). Only the BRIEF variables of Emotional Control and Shifting Attention were statistically significant variables for students with severe emotional conditions. The relationships between attentional control… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, EF had a negative correlation with externalizing behaviors—better scores on EF tasks was linked with lower externalizing behavior problems. These results are in line with those by Feifer and Rattan () and Mattison et al (), who discovered students receiving special education services for emotional/behavioral disorders had poor EF abilities, and Pitts (), who determined that compared to typical peers, they performed worse on EF tasks. In addition, poor EF has been linked in clinical populations to many of the mental health disorders (e.g., Barch, ; Kyte, Goodyer, & Sahakian, ; Penadés et al, ) and behavior problems (e.g., peer problems, teacher‐child conflict; Berry, ; Holmes, Kim‐Spoon, & Deater‐Deckard, ) that would qualify students for school‐based services through special education or alternative school placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, EF had a negative correlation with externalizing behaviors—better scores on EF tasks was linked with lower externalizing behavior problems. These results are in line with those by Feifer and Rattan () and Mattison et al (), who discovered students receiving special education services for emotional/behavioral disorders had poor EF abilities, and Pitts (), who determined that compared to typical peers, they performed worse on EF tasks. In addition, poor EF has been linked in clinical populations to many of the mental health disorders (e.g., Barch, ; Kyte, Goodyer, & Sahakian, ; Penadés et al, ) and behavior problems (e.g., peer problems, teacher‐child conflict; Berry, ; Holmes, Kim‐Spoon, & Deater‐Deckard, ) that would qualify students for school‐based services through special education or alternative school placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the developmental significance of EF for behavioral problems, few researchers have examined EF in the context of school‐based behavioral services in the United States (cf., Feifer & Rattan, ; Mattison, Hooper, & Carlson, ; Pitts, ). Of those who have, the compelling evidence of the importance of EF is offset by methodological weaknesses (e.g., homogenous samples, small sample sizes).…”
Section: Executive Function Of Students With Significant Behavior Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have found a relationship between EF deficits and the restrictiveness of special education placement (segregated, highly restrictive facility vs. inclusion in general education) in a sample of 40 students identified as having emotional/behavioral disorder and primarily struggling to control reactive aggression (Feifer & Rattan, 2007). Specifically, students placed in more restrictive settings because of their more severe behavior problems had greater deficits in EF than students in less restrictive general education settings.…”
Section: Behavioral and Academic Correlates Of Efmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Children with HFA/AS have a reduced ability to interpret social situations when required to attend to multiple aspects of a situation (Loveland and Tunali-Kotoski 2005), and show poor performance in inhibition of social responses, working memory for facial expressions, cognitive flexibility/ shifting, and vigilance to interpret contextual cues for social interactions (Corbett et al 2009;Ozonoff et al 1991;Ozonoff et al 2005). Deficits in these areas impact everyday social functioning (Fiefer and Rattan 2007), become more pronounced as children age, and may begin influencing other areas of overall functioning (Ozonoff et al 2005).…”
Section: Core Deficits Areas For Individuals With Hfa/asmentioning
confidence: 98%