Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-802219-1.00005-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Function, Theory of Mind, and Adaptive Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 268 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study confirmed the decrease in performance with increase in task difficulty (Granholm et al, 1996;Tokuda et al, 2011). We observed that L1NS, STDP, and LPF increased with increase in task difficulty, consistent with the study reported by Coulacoglou and Saklofske (2017). In all the cases, we observed that the parameter corresponding to a difficult task (3-Back and difficult arithmetic) was significantly higher than that corresponding to an easy task (1-Back and easy arithmetic).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our study confirmed the decrease in performance with increase in task difficulty (Granholm et al, 1996;Tokuda et al, 2011). We observed that L1NS, STDP, and LPF increased with increase in task difficulty, consistent with the study reported by Coulacoglou and Saklofske (2017). In all the cases, we observed that the parameter corresponding to a difficult task (3-Back and difficult arithmetic) was significantly higher than that corresponding to an easy task (1-Back and easy arithmetic).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this task, participants are tasked to respond to certain stimuli (the "go" stimuli") but also instructed to not respond to other stimuli (the "no-go" stimuli). The main measure in this task is the commission error rate, which is the rate of making a "go" response during a "no-go" trial [66].…”
Section: Event-related Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, we cannot predict the frequency effect on task processing a priori. Even though, a large number of studies investigated working memory by manipulating working-memory load and stimulus modality under single and dual-task conditions, there is still little systematic research on how n-back task properties like stimulus frequency affects performance (Coulacoglou & Saklofske 2017).…”
Section: Scheduled Interruptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%