2007
DOI: 10.1177/070674370705200811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Function Impairments in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Do They Differ between School and Home Environments?

Abstract: Consistent with the current theory, EF impairments, particularly in inhibition, appear to underlie the behavioural manifestation of ADHD. However, parents and teachers do not always agree when reporting EF impairments at home and in school. Thus information from both types of informants is essential for understanding and treating children with this disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

12
44
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
12
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that some children were on medication while in school ( Jarratt et al, 2005) and that the classroom environment is structured (Mares, McLuckie, Schwartz, & Saini, 2007) may account for teachers' witnessing more organized and controlled behavior than parents witnessed at home. In other studies, teachers reported higher (worse) BRIEF scores than parents ( Jarratt et al, 2005;McCandless & O'Laughlin, 2007;Mares et al, 2007). Differences between informants may be the result of cross-situational discrepancies in expectations and perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that some children were on medication while in school ( Jarratt et al, 2005) and that the classroom environment is structured (Mares, McLuckie, Schwartz, & Saini, 2007) may account for teachers' witnessing more organized and controlled behavior than parents witnessed at home. In other studies, teachers reported higher (worse) BRIEF scores than parents ( Jarratt et al, 2005;McCandless & O'Laughlin, 2007;Mares et al, 2007). Differences between informants may be the result of cross-situational discrepancies in expectations and perceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between informants may be the result of cross-situational discrepancies in expectations and perceptions. Future studies should examine the source of these differences with the aid of an independent informant who would observe the child in both environments (Mares et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminant validity of behaviour ratings for ADHD symptoms is far from impressive (Gomez et al, 2003(Gomez et al, , 2005. Levels of agreement between behavioural ratings across settings are low (Antrop et al, 2002;Gomez et al, 2003Gomez et al, , 2005Mares et al, 2007). Additionally, ratings are subject to the negative halo effect, which describes how one negative attribute or behaviour in a person can influence a rater to evaluate other behaviours and attributes negatively (Schachar, Sandberg, & Rutter, 1986;Stevens, Quittner, & Abikoff, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are based on information provided by families and teachers about the frequency or intensity of certain problem behaviors, which would be indicative of difficulties in EFs. Such measures have been widely developed in recent years, in part due to the recognition of the fact of EFs not only involve cognitive aspects, but also behavioral and emotional ones, many of which can only be observed in habitual contexts (Egeland & Fallmyr, 2010;Mares, McLuckie, Schwartz, & Saini, 2007). Among the best-known standardized assessment instruments are the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach, 1991), the Children Executive Function Inventory (CHEXI; Thorell & Nyberg, 2008), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF; Gioia, Isquith, Guy, & Kenworthy, 2000), and, more recently, the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale -Children and Adolescents (BDEFS-CA: Barkley, 2012).…”
Section: * Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%