2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive function and cortical thickness in youths prenatally exposed to cocaine, alcohol and tobacco

Abstract: Small and detrimental, albeit inconsistent, effects of prenatal cocaine exposure (PCE) during early childhood have been reported. The teratogenic effects of prenatal alcohol (PAE) and tobacco exposure (PTE) on neurobehavior are more firmly established than PCE. We tested if co-exposure to all three drugs could be related to greater differences in brain structure than exposure to cocaine alone. Participants (n=42, PCE=27; age range = 14–16 years) received an executive function battery prior to a T1-weighted 3T … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(99 reference statements)
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These volumetric findings are complemented by the independent surface-based findings, which showed a thinner cortex in the MFC, a thicker cortex in the OFC, and an thinner cortex in the SFC, supporting the hypothesis that frontal lobe dysfunction is one of the key predispositions towards aggression (Anderson & Kiehl, 2014; Brower & Price, 2001; Fahim et al, 2011; Viding, Seara-Cardoso, & McCrory, 2014; Wallace et al, 2014; Yang & Raine, 2009). Findings also support the argument that both increased and decreased regional volume/thickness may indicate a deviation from typical developmental trajectories and may reflect impaired cognitive functioning of that region (Gautam, Warner, Kan, & Sowell, 2015). The OFC, MFC, and the SFC are interactively involved in an extensive variety of crucial psychosocial and cognitive functions from directing and controlling attention, emotion regulation, decision-making, to executive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These volumetric findings are complemented by the independent surface-based findings, which showed a thinner cortex in the MFC, a thicker cortex in the OFC, and an thinner cortex in the SFC, supporting the hypothesis that frontal lobe dysfunction is one of the key predispositions towards aggression (Anderson & Kiehl, 2014; Brower & Price, 2001; Fahim et al, 2011; Viding, Seara-Cardoso, & McCrory, 2014; Wallace et al, 2014; Yang & Raine, 2009). Findings also support the argument that both increased and decreased regional volume/thickness may indicate a deviation from typical developmental trajectories and may reflect impaired cognitive functioning of that region (Gautam, Warner, Kan, & Sowell, 2015). The OFC, MFC, and the SFC are interactively involved in an extensive variety of crucial psychosocial and cognitive functions from directing and controlling attention, emotion regulation, decision-making, to executive function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Within the pediatric literature, the Stroop Test has been used to assess executive dysfunctions in several children illness groups, including Traumatic Brain Injury (Max et al, 2013), benign focal childhood epilepsy (Kernan et al, 2012), leukemia (Kim et al, 2015), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Assef, Capovilla, & Capovilla, 2007;Chang, Liu, Yu, & Lee, 2012), autism (Lai et al, 2016), learning disabilities (Westendorp, Hartman, Houwen, Smith, & Visscher, 2014), as well as prenatal exposure to alcohol, cocaine and tobacco (Gautam, Warner, Kan, & Sowell, 2015;Lebel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCE individuals also show altered neurodevelopment, including differences in cortical thickness (Gautam, Warner, Kan, & Sowell, 2015) that relates to executive functioning capabilities, including inhibition and cognitive control. Our work suggests that while more automatic feedback error detection may be intact, as evidenced by comparable FRN amplitudes across the groups, differences in neural responses emerged later in processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%