2004
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3321-04.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Dysfunction in Cocaine Addiction: Evidence for Discordant Frontal, Cingulate, and Cerebellar Activity

Abstract: Using a GO-NOGO response inhibition task in which working memory (WM) demands can be varied, we demonstrate that the compromised abilities of cocaine users to exert control over strong prepotent urges are associated with reduced activity in anterior cingulate and right prefrontal cortices, two regions thought to be critical for implementing cognitive control. Furthermore, unlike drug-naive controls, and opposite to the anterior cingulate pattern, cocaine users showed an over-reliance on the left cerebellum, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

54
391
3
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 601 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
54
391
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The general pattern of poorer inhibitory control in cocaine users is consistent with the extant literature (Bolla et al, 1999;Fillmore and Rush, 2002;Hester and Garavan, 2004), although intact performance has also been reported (Bolla et al, 2004;Goldstein et al, 2001;Hoff et al, 1996). It is possible that some of the cause of inconsistency lies with sampling power, primarily the number of observations, as both current tasks indicate a significant cocaine-related deficit when inhibitory performance is averaged across within-task conditions.…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The general pattern of poorer inhibitory control in cocaine users is consistent with the extant literature (Bolla et al, 1999;Fillmore and Rush, 2002;Hester and Garavan, 2004), although intact performance has also been reported (Bolla et al, 2004;Goldstein et al, 2001;Hoff et al, 1996). It is possible that some of the cause of inconsistency lies with sampling power, primarily the number of observations, as both current tasks indicate a significant cocaine-related deficit when inhibitory performance is averaged across within-task conditions.…”
Section: Inhibitory Controlsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, extended access to cocaine self-administration induced long-lasting impairments of working memory under high cognitive demand and high-incentive conditions that can be predicted by the increase in cocaine intake. The cognitive dysfunctions observed in LgA rats under a high, but not low, incentive condition, and in humans with cocaine addiction (Hester and Garavan, 2004), may result from an imbalance between a hypoactive cognitive system that controls decision-making under a high cognitive demand situation and an overactive incentive salience system (Bechara, 2005). The working memory impairment in this task also may be explained by an increase of perseveration or compulsion, a prominent feature of prefrontal cortex lesions (Brush et al, 1961;Mishkin, 1964;Pribram, 1961).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fronto-cerebellar interplay seems to be dynamic in nature and normally is dominated by frontal structures (Smith and Jonides, 1997;Gould et al, 2003), with cerebellar structures playing a supporting role. However, in addiction disorders, in which the frontal lobes are known to be compromised (Goldstein and Volkow, 2002), cerebellar (and vermis) activity appears to increase to support several tasks involving frontal lobe function including monetary reward response (Martin-Soelch et al, 2001), response inhibition (Hester and Garavan, 2004), and working memory (Desmond et al, 2003). Vermis activation also occurs during reward tasks in Parkinson's and in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder patients, but not in comparison subjects (Ernst et al, 2003;Goerendt et al, 2004;Kunig et al, 2000).…”
Section: Cerebellar Connectivity To Dopamine Circuitrymentioning
confidence: 99%