2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2390-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China

Abstract: This study investigates the relation between CEO compensation and corporate fraud in China. We document a significantly negative correlation between CEO compensation and corporate fraud using data on publicly traded firms between 2005 and 2010. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that firms penalize CEOs for fraud by lowering their pay. We also find that CEO compensation is lower in firms that commit more severe frauds. Panel data fixed effects and propensity score methods are used to demonstrate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
5
98
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is related to an earlier study of Inci (2012), which demonstrates that managers with shorter tenure are more likely to use profitable insider trading to compensate for the lower wages. We add to research highlighting the moral hazard problem associated with managerial risk-taking behavior and executive compensation, such as the study of Conyon and He (2016), who document that CEOs receive lower compensation when firms are detected in committing fraud.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is related to an earlier study of Inci (2012), which demonstrates that managers with shorter tenure are more likely to use profitable insider trading to compensate for the lower wages. We add to research highlighting the moral hazard problem associated with managerial risk-taking behavior and executive compensation, such as the study of Conyon and He (2016), who document that CEOs receive lower compensation when firms are detected in committing fraud.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conyon and He, 2016 [190] There is a significantly negative correlation between CEO compensation and corporate fraud. The CEO is penalized for fraud by reducing his salary.…”
Section: Author/year Main Contributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The negative side of these contracts is highlighted when intensification shown in misrepresentation and fraudulent financial data that mislead analysts about evaluation of firms (Johnson et al, 2005, Chesney andGibson-Asner, 2004). Interestingly, in some studies high compensation have negative association with fraud cases in china (Conyon and He, 2016) The arising question is based on executive either commit fraud just misinterpretation the stick price or by this means increase theirs payoffs under stock performance related compensation contract (Johnson et. al., 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%