2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive compensation among Australian mining and non-mining firms: Risk taking, long and short-term incentives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction of the presence of the compensation committee and ROA revealed a significant positive effect on CEO salary performance, and the interaction of the effectiveness of the compensation committee and ROA had a positive effect on total CEO compensation (Kanapathippillai et al, 2019). The remuneration committee moderates the effect of market capital on full pay, which is negatively significant for mining companies but not significant for non-mining companies in Australia (Yarram and Rice, 2017). The nomination and remuneration committee positively moderates the director pay slice on ROA, ROE, ROA earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and ROEEBIT but not Tobin's q, and the remuneration nomination committee positively moderates the director pay slice on ROA, ROAEBIT and ROEEBIT in the future but does not moderate ROE and Tobin's q (Rahayu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Moderation Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction of the presence of the compensation committee and ROA revealed a significant positive effect on CEO salary performance, and the interaction of the effectiveness of the compensation committee and ROA had a positive effect on total CEO compensation (Kanapathippillai et al, 2019). The remuneration committee moderates the effect of market capital on full pay, which is negatively significant for mining companies but not significant for non-mining companies in Australia (Yarram and Rice, 2017). The nomination and remuneration committee positively moderates the director pay slice on ROA, ROE, ROA earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) and ROEEBIT but not Tobin's q, and the remuneration nomination committee positively moderates the director pay slice on ROA, ROAEBIT and ROEEBIT in the future but does not moderate ROE and Tobin's q (Rahayu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Moderation Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the busyness of the executive and board involved in the monitoring function, institutional investors and shareholders view the nomination committee as an important signal of the board's ability to build and maintain independence (Shivdasani and Yermack, 1999). The presence of the nomination and remuneration committee in several studies shows increased access to resources to reduce agency costs, improving company performance (Harymawan et al, 2020;Vinjamury, 2020), board gender diversity (Hutchinson et al, 2015) and CEO compensation and executive (Kanapathippillai et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2023;Yarram and Rice, 2017). Table 2 presents several studies related to the presence of the nomination and remuneration committee.…”
Section: The Existence Of a Nomination And Remuneration Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, optimal contracting theorists attribute skyrocketing executive pay to talent scarcity and the increasing complexity of management duties, whereas managerial power theory credits the rise in executive pay to rent extraction by entrenched executives rather than market forces. (Rogal, 2019;Yarram & Rice, 2017).…”
Section: Theories Of Executive Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madimu (2022) argues that the mining sector in South Africa has experienced a continuing decline in recent years with regard to economic feasibility and productivity. Mining, by its very nature of being a "price taker," experiences earnings volatility with huge investments in capital expenditure, as well as an uncertain and fluid operating environment (Yarram and Rice 2017). Despite a decline in the performance of the South African mining sector that emanated from the protest actions, executives still appear to believe that they deserve exorbitant pay packages (Viviers 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%