2019
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/n438d
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive and default network connectivity reflects conceptual interference during creative imagery generation

Abstract: Functional neuroimaging research has recently begun to explore cognitive mechanisms of creativity that underlie the interactions between large-scale brain networks—specifically regions of the executive control (ECN) and default (DN) networks. Increased ECN-DN coupling has been shown to occur when participants are required to overcome conceptual interference (i.e., activation of salient conceptual knowledge); however, most studies have used creativity tasks with verbal stimuli. Here we examine whether overcomin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) and aimed at producing original and useful ideas [19,39,40]. Creative ability has been linked to executive capacity [41][42][43], and appears to reflect one's ability for rejecting uncreative ideas [44][45][46][47], maintaining focus on internally generated thoughts against external distractors [45,48], deliberately evaluating the quality of an idea [18], or implementing more creative but also more executively taxing idea generation strategies [30]. Each of these cognitive processes may contribute to increased variability, but only indirectly-by supporting the generation of a particular range of "more creative" thought contents.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Understanding Mental State Dynamics Dynamic Framework Of Thought (Dft)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) and aimed at producing original and useful ideas [19,39,40]. Creative ability has been linked to executive capacity [41][42][43], and appears to reflect one's ability for rejecting uncreative ideas [44][45][46][47], maintaining focus on internally generated thoughts against external distractors [45,48], deliberately evaluating the quality of an idea [18], or implementing more creative but also more executively taxing idea generation strategies [30]. Each of these cognitive processes may contribute to increased variability, but only indirectly-by supporting the generation of a particular range of "more creative" thought contents.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Understanding Mental State Dynamics Dynamic Framework Of Thought (Dft)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased DMN–ECN cooperation observed during creative cognition is also suggestive of interacting associative and controlled processes, and may signify the DMN spontaneously activating ideas (Beaty et al, 2020; Beaty & Lloyd-Cox, 2020), while the ECN network inhibits prepotent ideas (Beaty, Christensen, et al, 2017; Christensen et al, 2019; Lloyd-Cox et al, 2021) and implements creative strategies (Benedek & Jauk, 2018). Indeed, DMN–ECN cooperation during creative cognition appears to increase when there is a need for inhibition (Beaty, Christensen, et al, 2017; Christensen et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Theories That Guide Ncrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meanwhile, evidence linking creative cognition to intelligence and executive functions has led to suggestions that controlled creative processes may include strategic search processes (Avitia & Kaufman, 2014;Benedek & Neubauer, 2013;Forthmann, Bürkner, et al, 2019;Lebuda & Benedek, 2023;Silvia et al, 2013), and the inhibition of distracting or unoriginal thoughts (Beaty, Christensen, et al, 2017;Volle, 2018). The increased DMN-ECN cooperation observed during creative cognition is also suggestive of interacting associative and controlled processes, and may signify the DMN spontaneously activating ideas , while the ECN network inhibits prepotent ideas (Beaty, Christensen, et al, 2017;Christensen et al, 2019;Lloyd-Cox et al, 2021) and implements creative strategies (Benedek & Jauk, 2018). Indeed, DMN-ECN cooperation during creative cognition appears to increase when there is a need for inhibition (Beaty, Christensen, et al, 2017;Christensen et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Theories That Guide Ncrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deliberate, cognitive control processes which occur during evaluative modes of thought may include evaluations of the novelty and utility of ideas (Ellamil et al, 2012) as well as the selective retrieval or suppression of certain semantic content (Beaty et al, 2017;Christensen et al, 2019;Pinho et al, 2016). At the neural level, these processes have been linked at least in part to recruitment of the frontoparietal control network (see Figure 1), a brain network associated with the flexible, top-down implementation of cognitive control and executive function (Christoff et al, 2016;Dosenbach et al, 2008;Niendam et al, 2012;Spreng et al, 2010;Vincent et al, 2008;Zamani et al, 2021).…”
Section: Generating and Evaluating Thoughts To Support Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%