1965
DOI: 10.1093/jn/85.4.419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excretion of Histidine and Histidine Derivatives by Human Subjects Ingesting Protein from Different Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Block et al 1965;Perry et al 1967), to our Tsuji, 1987). The brush-border transport of carnosine is said to be regulated by dietary levels of amino acids, peptides and/or proteins (Ferraris, Diamond & Kwan, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Block et al 1965;Perry et al 1967), to our Tsuji, 1987). The brush-border transport of carnosine is said to be regulated by dietary levels of amino acids, peptides and/or proteins (Ferraris, Diamond & Kwan, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Carnosinase activity of jejunal mucosa by weight is therefore approximately 200 to 400 times that of normal human plasma. Carnosine and anserine are found in minimal amounts (2 to 3 mg and 5 to 7 mg per day respectively) in the urine of healthy subjects (Westall, 1955), but the excretion strongly depends on the intake of animal flesh in the diet (Block, Hubbard, and Steele, 1965). The hydrolytic capacity of the intestinal enzyme for carnosine and anserine can therefore be easily saturated in healthy adults by giving sufficient beef steak (which contains 0 03 % carnosine by weight) or chicken breast (which contains both dipeptides).…”
Section: Range Of Meanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors had previously found that 3-methylhistidine, unlike other amino acids, released from muscle during protein depletion, was not reutilized in protein synthesis (7). For 1-methylhistidine Block et al (8) have suggested that the urinary excretion tended to reflect its dietary intake. This explanation does not seem tenable for 3-methylhistidine since it has not been found in any of the foods analyzed, yet it was recovered from the urine of the subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%