2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2019.111786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excluding the fork and antifork

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, x i has no nonneighbor in N (A), which means that X i is complete to N (A). This proves (2).…”
Section: Lemma 22 [8]supporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, x i has no nonneighbor in N (A), which means that X i is complete to N (A). This proves (2).…”
Section: Lemma 22 [8]supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In [2,3,11], the authors proved that (fork, H)-free graphs are linearly χ-bounded when H ∈ {C 4 , K 4 , diamond, K 3 ∪ K 1 , paw, P 3 ∪ 2K 1 , K 5 − e, antifork}, where an antifork is the complement graph of a fork.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second author with Maffray [8] showed that every (P4+P1,trueP4+P1¯ ${P}_{4}+{P}_{1},\bar{{P}_{4}+{P}_{1}}$)‐free graph G $G$ satisfies χ(G)5ω(G)4 $\chi (G)\le \lceil \phantom{\rule[-0.5em]{}{0ex}}\frac{5\omega (G)}{4}\rceil $, and that the bound is tight. Recently, Chudnovsky et al [2] showed that every (fork, anti‐fork)‐free graph G $G$ satisfies χ(G)2ω(G) $\chi (G)\le 2\omega (G)$, and that the bound is asymptotically tight. Thus, Problem 1 is open for seven pairwise nonisomorphic forests on five vertices, as there are 10 such forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Recently, Chudnovsky et al [4] proved a structure theorem for the class of (fork, antifork)-free graphs, and used it to prove that every (fork, antifork)-free graph G satisfies χ(G) 2ω(G). (Here, an antifork is the complement graph of a fork.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%