Semiconductor Physics 2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-18286-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the data shown in Figure 4A, V g was calculated as ∼1.25 V. From two samples collected with the same potential step size, the average bandgap was V g = 1.2 ± 0.1 V. This value agrees well with the literature spectroscopic value for the silicon bandgap, E g = 1.12 eV. 44 Furthermore, in Figure 4B, eq 5 was used to calculate the corresponding DOS derived from Figure 4A. Lastly, the line shape of both Figure 4A,B can be compared with the well-known calculated band structure for bulk silicon, and the calculation was reproduced here in Figure 4C for reference 45−47 Non-idealities were sometimes observed during data collection.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the data shown in Figure 4A, V g was calculated as ∼1.25 V. From two samples collected with the same potential step size, the average bandgap was V g = 1.2 ± 0.1 V. This value agrees well with the literature spectroscopic value for the silicon bandgap, E g = 1.12 eV. 44 Furthermore, in Figure 4B, eq 5 was used to calculate the corresponding DOS derived from Figure 4A. Lastly, the line shape of both Figure 4A,B can be compared with the well-known calculated band structure for bulk silicon, and the calculation was reproduced here in Figure 4C for reference 45−47 Non-idealities were sometimes observed during data collection.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the electrochemical bandgap derived from the capacitance−potential plot was extrapolated as V g = 0.7 V, consistent with the literature value for the spectroscopic bandgap of E g = 0.664 eV. 44 The experimentally determined DOS values at the band edge for both silicon and germanium surfaces occured within the same order of magnitude as those expected for the VB and CB edges.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, the drain current density I D improves by 52 ± 20% at Δ ε = 0.48 ± 0.05%, with an enhancement rate of 109 ± 33 per % of biaxial strain. This trend is consistent with the mobility change, as I D is proportional to μ with fixed carrier concentration in the linear regime . Finally, there is only a small shift in the threshold voltage V th with strain, reaching a value of Δ V th = 9.1 ± 6.1 V at Δ ε = 0.48 ± 0.05%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The “ 2 ” superscript indicates irreducible representations that belong to superpositional point groups in which the base identity operation ( E ) has a character of “2” (including all A n and B n terms) rather than “1”; this notation is required to account for the degeneracies of all converging and diverging states. Part A is reproduced with permission from ref , Copyright 1987, Springer; part B was derived therefrom by the present author.…”
Section: Band Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%