1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.117879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited states of individual quantum dots studied by photoluminescence spectroscopy

Abstract: The photoluminescence from individual InP quantum dots embedded in a matrix of GaInP has been studied. In addition to the ground state emission that consists of several peaks, we observe excited states of the dot. These states are observed either via state filling or with photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy. We observe a fast relaxation to the set of states with lowest energy but no relaxation between these states.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
56
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with PL measurements shows good agreement with the major features [13]. PL of single quantum dots shows energies in the range 1.62 − 1.64eV, which corresponds to the calculated energies for island heights in the range 14 − 17 nm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison with PL measurements shows good agreement with the major features [13]. PL of single quantum dots shows energies in the range 1.62 − 1.64eV, which corresponds to the calculated energies for island heights in the range 14 − 17 nm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although the band diagram shows a pocket below the island, there are no localized states there. The localized valence-band states provide a partial explanation for the observation of multiple lines seen in photoluminescence (PL) [13]. An excited hole that relaxed into a B state would be unable to transfer into one of the A states, and would instead recombine with an electron in its ground state.…”
Section: Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12]27 For example, a range of single dot line widths over 2 orders of magnitude have been reported for II-VI nanocrystallite QDs. [9][10][11] It has therefore been difficult to use single dot line shapes to learn about the intrinsic physics of these QD systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Second, the dot forms in the quantum well under the InP stressor, far from the sample surface and from the sidewalls, so that no surface states and depletion layers affect the recombination. This is not the case in dots that are isolated through a metallic mask, 16 where the Schottky barrier may change the band alignment, or in free-standing dots that are affected by charges at the surface. 17 In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%