2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.026803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited States in Bilayer Graphene Quantum Dots

Abstract: We report on ground-and excited state transport through an electrostatically defined few-hole quantum dot in bilayer graphene in both parallel and perpendicular applied magnetic fields. A remarkably clear level scheme for the two-particle spectra is found by analyzing finite bias spectroscopy data within a two-particle model including spin and valley degrees of freedom. We identify the two-hole ground-state to be a spin-triplet and valley-singlet state. This spin alignment can be seen as Hund's rule for a vall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The source and drain edge contacts are realized by a Reactive Ion Etching process and Cr (10nm)/Au (50nm) deposition [8]. The few-layer graphite at the bottom of the stack plays the role of a high quality back gate (BG) [9,10]. Figure 1a shows a sketch of the device structure.…”
Section: Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The source and drain edge contacts are realized by a Reactive Ion Etching process and Cr (10nm)/Au (50nm) deposition [8]. The few-layer graphite at the bottom of the stack plays the role of a high quality back gate (BG) [9,10]. Figure 1a shows a sketch of the device structure.…”
Section: Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confinement potential and the gap are chosen in accordance with recent experiments and corresponding simulations [9,13,14] to be of the form…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 This value is in contrast to the maximum extracted g v of around 17 which has also been observed in earlier works. 29 The slightly smaller average valley g -factor in the model compared to that from the experiment might be due to the specific potential shape, strain, 44 additional valley splitting, or effects which are not captured by the single particle Hamiltonian. The small electron hole asymmetry might be explained by the different QD size for electrons and holes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…none of the QDs is empty. Thus, the description in the single particle picture is no longer valid and interaction effects such as exchange are becoming relevant [26], leading to the observation of an enriched spectrum of available transitions. Under the influence of an out-of-plane field (B = 0.25 T, see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%