“…Hence, although the IPT process in infeasible in the ground state, the photoinduced proton transfer reaction is feasible in the S 1 and the T 1 states from both thermodynamic and kinetic reasons. The activation barriers from our calculations appear to be a little higher than the experimental values [11,16,25,27,37,48,53]. This deviation may be because of the fact that the short range specific interactions, like hydrogen bonding, have not been considered in the present work.…”
“…There is also a difference in the temporal behaviour of the fluorescence decay of the rotamer and the formation of the tautomer [18,39]. These evidences indicate that the electronic excitation of the species leads to the ESIPT product from only one of the two rotameric forms in selected solvents [23,25,27,28,[33][34][35]37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Mordzinski and Grellmann suggested that a thermally activated radiationless transition dominates the decay of the photoproduced keto form at room temperature, whereas, at lower temperature, fluorescence and intersystem crossing are the main deactivation processes [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They have also calculated the molecular geometry of the excited enol and keto forms using the MNDO methods [36]. Effect of rotamerism and hydrogen bonding on the ESIPT in HBO and HBI has also been studied using steadystate and time-resolved emission spectroscopy at various temperatures and by semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods like CNDO/SCI and AM1 [16,37].…”
Two series of compounds, one comprising of 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole (HBO), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzimidazole (HBI), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole (HBT), and the other of 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)oxazole (HPO), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)imidazole (HPI) and 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)thiazole (HPT) are susceptible to ground state rotamerization as well as excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reactions. Some of these compounds show experimental evidence of the existence of two ground state conformers. Out of these two one undergoes ESIPT reaction leading to the formation of the tautomer. The two photophysical processes, in combination, result in the production of a number of fluorescence bands each one of which corresponding to a particular species. Semiempirical AM1-SCI calculations have been performed to rationalize the photophysical behaviour of the compounds. The calculations suggest that for the first series of compounds, two rotational isomers are present in the ground state of HBO and HBI while HBT has a single conformer under similar circumstances. For the molecules of the other series existence of rotamers depends very much on the polarity of the environment. The potential energy curves (PEC) for the ESIPT process in different electronic states of the molecules have been generated theoretically. The simulated PECs reveal that for all these systems the IPT reaction is unfavourable in the ground state but feasible, both kinetically and thermodynamically, in the S 1 as well as T 1 states.
“…Hence, although the IPT process in infeasible in the ground state, the photoinduced proton transfer reaction is feasible in the S 1 and the T 1 states from both thermodynamic and kinetic reasons. The activation barriers from our calculations appear to be a little higher than the experimental values [11,16,25,27,37,48,53]. This deviation may be because of the fact that the short range specific interactions, like hydrogen bonding, have not been considered in the present work.…”
“…There is also a difference in the temporal behaviour of the fluorescence decay of the rotamer and the formation of the tautomer [18,39]. These evidences indicate that the electronic excitation of the species leads to the ESIPT product from only one of the two rotameric forms in selected solvents [23,25,27,28,[33][34][35]37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Mordzinski and Grellmann suggested that a thermally activated radiationless transition dominates the decay of the photoproduced keto form at room temperature, whereas, at lower temperature, fluorescence and intersystem crossing are the main deactivation processes [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They have also calculated the molecular geometry of the excited enol and keto forms using the MNDO methods [36]. Effect of rotamerism and hydrogen bonding on the ESIPT in HBO and HBI has also been studied using steadystate and time-resolved emission spectroscopy at various temperatures and by semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods like CNDO/SCI and AM1 [16,37].…”
Two series of compounds, one comprising of 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole (HBO), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzimidazole (HBI), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole (HBT), and the other of 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)oxazole (HPO), 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)imidazole (HPI) and 2-(2′-hydroxyphenyl)thiazole (HPT) are susceptible to ground state rotamerization as well as excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reactions. Some of these compounds show experimental evidence of the existence of two ground state conformers. Out of these two one undergoes ESIPT reaction leading to the formation of the tautomer. The two photophysical processes, in combination, result in the production of a number of fluorescence bands each one of which corresponding to a particular species. Semiempirical AM1-SCI calculations have been performed to rationalize the photophysical behaviour of the compounds. The calculations suggest that for the first series of compounds, two rotational isomers are present in the ground state of HBO and HBI while HBT has a single conformer under similar circumstances. For the molecules of the other series existence of rotamers depends very much on the polarity of the environment. The potential energy curves (PEC) for the ESIPT process in different electronic states of the molecules have been generated theoretically. The simulated PECs reveal that for all these systems the IPT reaction is unfavourable in the ground state but feasible, both kinetically and thermodynamically, in the S 1 as well as T 1 states.
“…Excited state intramolecular proton transfer and rotamerization of HBI have been studied using steady-state and time-resolved emission spectroscopy and also by semiempirical quantum chemical methods [17]. Picosecond spectroscopic studies have been performed on the excited state intramolecular proton transfer in HBT [23,24] where a change in the fluorometric behavior of the compound in different environmental conditions has been highlighted.…”
Using the method of density functional theory in approximating B3LYPwith the basis set 6-31G* the computations of structures and UV-vis spectra (TDDFT method) of benzazols derivatives were performed. The comparison of estimated electron spectra with the observed ones was made indicating good agreement of theoretically obtained results with experiment. Moreover these compounds have distinctive spectralluminescent properties (large stokes shift) because of intramolecular proton transfer in excited state.
“…Proton transfer is an area of wide interest due to its ubiquitous nature and recently many intramolecular proton transfer (IPT) reactions have been studied [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The advent of ultrafast spectroscopic methods has permitted kinetic studies on the nano-, pico-and femtosecond timescales [2][3][4].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.