The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited-state dynamics of imiquimod in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second one (pKa = 7.3) was calculated using the Henderson–Hasselbach equation by extrapolating to zero methanol concentration the apparent pKa measured in water–methanol solutions [ 6 ]. The third paper [ 24 ] reports a pKa of 6.8 based on spectroscopic analysis in water at different pH, and it was attributed to quinoline nitrogen. Interestingly, this value is not significantly different from the experimental value determined in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one (pKa = 7.3) was calculated using the Henderson–Hasselbach equation by extrapolating to zero methanol concentration the apparent pKa measured in water–methanol solutions [ 6 ]. The third paper [ 24 ] reports a pKa of 6.8 based on spectroscopic analysis in water at different pH, and it was attributed to quinoline nitrogen. Interestingly, this value is not significantly different from the experimental value determined in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐resolved fluorescence decay investigations were performed to investigate and confirm PCAD's interaction with the Pu24T GQ DNA. This lifetime study is sensitive to excited state correlations and offers an accurate indication of a compound's surroundings [17,18] . To analyse PCAD's behaviour in Pu24T GQ DNA conditions, we used the average fluorescence lifetime (τ avg ) rather than individual decay components using tri‐exponential decay data fitting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%