Quantum Chemistry and Dynamics of Excited States 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119417774.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited‐State Calculations with Quantum Monte Carlo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another way to extend the crystal spectral warping method would be through using methods other than semi-local/hybrid TDDFT for the two levels of calculation. In particular, going beyond hybrid TDDFT could allow phenomena such as excitons to be included; such methods could include the Bethe–Salpeter equation, quantum Monte Carlo, or even (multi-reference) coupled cluster theory . However, there are three considerations regarding which methods could be picked.…”
Section: Potential Future Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to extend the crystal spectral warping method would be through using methods other than semi-local/hybrid TDDFT for the two levels of calculation. In particular, going beyond hybrid TDDFT could allow phenomena such as excitons to be included; such methods could include the Bethe–Salpeter equation, quantum Monte Carlo, or even (multi-reference) coupled cluster theory . However, there are three considerations regarding which methods could be picked.…”
Section: Potential Future Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been demonstrated that the scaling of computing a multideterminant expansion and optimizing can also be strongly reduced. This is done using the determinant Lemma which allows a Slater determinant to be updated efficiently when only a few columns are modified. QMC has been used extensively for the description of materials including excited states …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the classical computing side, state-of-the-art methods such as quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) simulations have proven to be effective [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], as they do not suffer from the infamous sign problem of fermionic systems. However, QMC is usually restricted to groundstate calculations, although extensions to molecular properties [31][32][33][34][35] and excited states [36][37][38][39][40] have been developed. The rise of quantum computing can open alternative routes to groundstate calculations (and beyond) for many-boson systems, for instance based on superconducting circuits [41][42][43][44][45], cold-atom lattices [46,47] or photonic quantum devices [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] (such as Gaussian boson sampling experiments [48,49,52,53]), essentially used as analog quantum simulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%