2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.09941
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitations in the Higher Lattice Gauge Theory Model for Topological Phases III: the 3+1d Case

Abstract: In this, the third paper in our series describing the excitations of the higher lattice gauge theory model for topological phases, we will examine the 3+1d case in detail. We will explicitly construct the ribbon and membrane operators which create the topological excitations, and use these creation operators to find the pattern of condensation and confinement. We also use these operators to find the braiding relations of the excitations, and to construct charge measurement operators which project to states of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the blue-shaded plaquettes are those for which the 1-flatness/plaquette stabiliser conditions are violated. Note however that interpreting this excitation strictly as a 1-flux requires some care as the cube operators are defined to vanish whenever the 1-flatness is not everywhere satisfied around the cube (see [76] for a discussion on the interplay between 1-and 2-fluxes). The domain wall n is distinct from the trivial one 1 E1 since we cannot annihilate the resulting magnetic excitation with a local or genuine line-like operator without creating additional excitations or altering the condensation defect itself.…”
Section: Iic Boundary Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the blue-shaded plaquettes are those for which the 1-flatness/plaquette stabiliser conditions are violated. Note however that interpreting this excitation strictly as a 1-flux requires some care as the cube operators are defined to vanish whenever the 1-flatness is not everywhere satisfied around the cube (see [76] for a discussion on the interplay between 1-and 2-fluxes). The domain wall n is distinct from the trivial one 1 E1 since we cannot annihilate the resulting magnetic excitation with a local or genuine line-like operator without creating additional excitations or altering the condensation defect itself.…”
Section: Iic Boundary Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%