1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00146226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation of non-axially symmetric modes of the Sun's mean magnetic field

Abstract: The kinematic dynamo equations for the mean magnetic field are solved with an asymptotic method of the WKB type. The excitation conditions and main characteristics of the non-axially symmetric modes for a given distribution of the sources are obtained. Utilization of the helioseismologic data on the Sun's internal rotation permits an explanation, within the framework of dynamo theory, of the excitation of the main non-axially symmetric modes revealed in the Sun's magnetic field sector structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-axisymmetric α 2 Ω mean-field models also suggest a lower critical dynamo number for non-axisymmetric dynamo modes (e.g. Ruzmaikin et al 1988;Bassom et al 2005). These findings may explain the onset of the new larger wave number magnetic mode in our strongly stratified cases.…”
Section: Influence Of Stratificationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Non-axisymmetric α 2 Ω mean-field models also suggest a lower critical dynamo number for non-axisymmetric dynamo modes (e.g. Ruzmaikin et al 1988;Bassom et al 2005). These findings may explain the onset of the new larger wave number magnetic mode in our strongly stratified cases.…”
Section: Influence Of Stratificationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The present approach is different from the one used by Ruzmaikin et al (1988). They implicitly assumed that the maxima of the generation sources and the maxima of the solution coincide with each other, and obtained conditions to determine the constant Γ and the functions S in the form of power‐series expansions up to the second‐order terms.…”
Section: The Asymptotic Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assumed that the maximum of the asymptotic solution coincides with the maximum of the sources of the field generation. Ruzmaikin & Starchenko (1988), Ruzmaikin, Sokoloff & Starchenko (1988) and also Makarov, Ruzmaikin & Starchenko (1987) considered α Ω dynamo models in the framework of asymptotic WKBJ methods in the strong‐generation limiting case. Such a short‐wave approximation approach had problems with the calculation of the solution near the so‐called turning points, and the fact that the dynamo equations are rather different from the well‐studied quantum mechanics equations did not allow researchers to apply standard methods uniformly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The possibility of preferable generation of a non‐axisymmetric solution by an αΩ‐ or α 2 Ω‐dynamo was discussed previously (see e.g. Ruzmaikin, Sokoloff & Starchenko 1988), however such models require very specific configurations of rotation and helicity in order to reduce the destructive effect of differential rotation on the non‐axisymmetric field. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%