1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01421701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation functions of nuclear reactions producing11C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 that the cross sections from the present experiment fall along high side of the upper curve previously set by the measurements of Anders et al [6] and Welch et al [7] and calculations of Dimbylow [5]. The predictions of Dimbylow [5] are within our error bars, as are, for the most part, the measurements from Anders et al [6] and Welch et al [7]. …”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 that the cross sections from the present experiment fall along high side of the upper curve previously set by the measurements of Anders et al [6] and Welch et al [7] and calculations of Dimbylow [5]. The predictions of Dimbylow [5] are within our error bars, as are, for the most part, the measurements from Anders et al [6] and Welch et al [7]. …”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The empty symbols are previously published data: Brolley et al (blue circles) [8], Brill et al (pink circles) [9], Anders et al (green circles) [6], Welch et al (blue triangles) [7], Soewarsono et al (pink triangles) [10], Uno et al (green triangles) [11], and optical model calcualtions of Dimbylow (blue diamonds) [5]. The solid red symbols are from this experiment using the polyethylene target and both NaI detectors in coincidence; the larger of the associated error bars indicates the increase in overall uncertainty when the uncertainty in incident neutron energy is included.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the excitation function for the 12 C(n,2n) n C reaction in SCINFUL is shown in Figure 7. It agrees with the recent data of Anders et al 30 up to 34 MeV, cross section data being somewhat larger than earlier data. 31 For E n > 34 MeV one can only "evaluate" the excitation function by a "best estimate" smooth curve which intersects 22 mb at E" = 90 MeV, i.e., the value quoted (but not measured) by Kellogg.…”
Section: Cross Sections As Needed To Obtain a Better Representation Osupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1 , and have a constant value of about 20 mb, though there can be seen some discrepancy between results measured at TIARA and RIKEN. The ENDFIB-VI data I) which are evaluated according to the values of Anders et al 12) are more than 50 % higher than ours below 40 Me V, however above 40 MeV the ENDFIB-VI data rapidly decrease with energy and give much lower values than our data. 21O-x Bi (x = 3,12) reactions.…”
Section: C(n2n)llc Reactionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As clearly seen in Fig.l, the existent cross section data below 40 Me V are clearly divided into two groups, high values by Anders et aI. 12 ) and lower values by Brill et al 13 ) Our data below 40Me V 4 ) agree with the lower values and our data above 40 Me V7) are smoothly connected to our data below 40 MeV in Fig. 1 , and have a constant value of about 20 mb, though there can be seen some discrepancy between results measured at TIARA and RIKEN.…”
Section: C(n2n)llc Reactionmentioning
confidence: 91%