1987
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(87)90297-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation energy and transition strength systematics of mixed symmetric Jπ = 1+ states from inelastic electron scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes more 1 + states are seen in (p,p') than in {e,e') and vice versa. A possible explanation is that some of the 1 + states correspond predominantly to the orbital (/) transitions, which are strongly excited by electrons but only weakly by protons (Bohle et aL, 1986;Hartmann et aL, 1987). In some cases a destructive interference between the orbital and spin parts of the Ml operator might occur in (e,e f ).…”
Section: Sp Sn T 3 (J)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes more 1 + states are seen in (p,p') than in {e,e') and vice versa. A possible explanation is that some of the 1 + states correspond predominantly to the orbital (/) transitions, which are strongly excited by electrons but only weakly by protons (Bohle et aL, 1986;Hartmann et aL, 1987). In some cases a destructive interference between the orbital and spin parts of the Ml operator might occur in (e,e f ).…”
Section: Sp Sn T 3 (J)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbital mode 1 + states has been found for the isotopes with permanent deformation in a wide region beginning from light nuclei (such as 46 Ti) up to the actinides, including also transitional and γ-soft nuclei. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The remarkable features of the scissors mode obtained from experimental results are the quadratic dependence of the summed B(M1) values on the ground state deformation parameter δ and the strong fragmentation of the M1 strength above the pairing gap up to 4 MeV excitation energy. [14][15][16] There exists a strong correlation between the B(E2, 0 + 1 → 2 + 1 0) strength and summed B(M1) strengths and saturation of these strengths at midshell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach breaks F -spin symmetry [9] and could cause a significant amount of F -spin mixing into the lowenergy states if the Majorana interaction were not too strong [10]. The properties of mixed-symmetry states with F -spin quantum number F = F max − 1 are very sensitive to the strength of the Majorana interaction [11] and, thus, to the amount of F -spin mixing in the lowenergy wave functions [12]. In fact, F -spin multiplets of states of neighboring nuclei, including Yb nuclei, have been observed for symmetric states with F = F max [11] and the scissors mode with F = F max − 1 [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of mixed-symmetry states with F -spin quantum number F = F max − 1 are very sensitive to the strength of the Majorana interaction [11] and, thus, to the amount of F -spin mixing in the lowenergy wave functions [12]. In fact, F -spin multiplets of states of neighboring nuclei, including Yb nuclei, have been observed for symmetric states with F = F max [11] and the scissors mode with F = F max − 1 [13]. These observations suggest that F -spin is not severely broken in the corresponding nuclei which may rule out an SU (3) ⋆ -like description even for the nuclei in the mass region A ≈ 170.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%