Excision: Practices, discourses and feminist commitment

Accad, Évelyne

doi:10.1007/bf02685734

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…She writes, ‘Women … do not realize that some of the practices they promote were designed to subjugate them … ’. And Accad (1993: n.p.) argues that African women resist alliance with Western women because they value ‘loyalty’ to African men over ‘truth’ (see also Annas, 1996; Thiam, 1998 [1983]).…”

Section: Framing Fgcsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Some scholars portray people in communities that practice FGCs as cruel. For example, implying cruelty on the part of men (and sometimes women), scholars call FGCs ‘horror[s]’; ‘brut[al]’, ‘cruel’, and ‘torture’ (Accad, 1993: n.p. ; Annas, 1996: 325, 353; Koso-Thomas, 1987: 2; Lowenstein, 1978: 421; McGarrahan, 1991: 269; Simms, 1993: 1954; Slack, 1988: 466; Thiam, 1998 [1983]: 382; White, 2001: 192).…”

Section: Framing Fgcsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Learning from “Female Genital Mutilation”: Lessons from 30 Years of Academic Discourse

Wade

2011

Ethnicities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the intersection of feminism and postcolonial theory is an acrimonious debate over female genital cutting (FGC). I subject this debate to an analysis in order to separate productive from destructive discursive strategies. I find that both FGC and the literature about the practice are frequently mischaracterized in consequential ways. Especially prior to the mid-1990s, scholars frame FGC as an example of either cultural inferiority or cultural difference. In the 1990s, postcolonial scholars contest the framing of FGC as a measure of cultural inferiority. However, they often argue that Western feminist engagement with FGCs, writ large, is 'imperialist'. I contend that both accusations of African 'barbarism' and of Western feminist 'imperialism' are empirically false and inflammatory. Furthermore, reifying 'African' and 'Western' perspectives erases African opposition to FGC and Western feminist acknowledgement of transnational power asymmetry. I conclude with a discussion of the role of outrage in academic scholarship.

show abstract

Section: Framing Fgcsmentioning

confidence: 97%