2001
DOI: 10.1007/pl00011340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excimer Laser for Pacemaker and Defibrillator Lead Extraction: Techniques and Clinical Results

Abstract: Pacing and defibrillation leads may need to be removed for several reasons including infection, interference with others leads, lack of vascular access or redundancy. However, the removal of chronically implanted leads is a major technical challenge because of the extensive adhesions that develop along the course of the leads over time. The techniques to remove chronic leads have been greatly facilitated by the development of an excimer laser sheath. We undertook an analysis of our experience with laser extrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcium was observed along the trajectory of these two leads, leading the authors to suggest that the LLE failures were related to calcified adhesions. Gilligan and Dan report difficulty in advancing the laser sheath over nine of 50 leads (18%) and likewise postulated that lead calcifications factored into this difficulty . The problem of calcified adhesions was ameliorated in their study by advancing a stainless‐steel sheath over the lead or by upsizing the laser sheath, and the authors reported a 96% complete extraction success rate and only one minor complication (venous occlusion with arm swelling) using those techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium was observed along the trajectory of these two leads, leading the authors to suggest that the LLE failures were related to calcified adhesions. Gilligan and Dan report difficulty in advancing the laser sheath over nine of 50 leads (18%) and likewise postulated that lead calcifications factored into this difficulty . The problem of calcified adhesions was ameliorated in their study by advancing a stainless‐steel sheath over the lead or by upsizing the laser sheath, and the authors reported a 96% complete extraction success rate and only one minor complication (venous occlusion with arm swelling) using those techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success and complication rates reflect this particular approach, which did not consider alternative extraction technologies such as electrosurgical (radiofrequency) sheaths. Several series have previously described procedural efficacy and complication rates associated with laser extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads 3–8 . The “Pacing Lead Extraction with the eXcimer Sheath” (PLEXES) trial 6 compared laser lead extraction with Teflon telescoping sheaths in 301 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All laser lead extractions were performed with the Spectranectics laser sheath removal system (Colorado Springs, Colorado, CO, USA). The extraction technique has been previously detailed 3–6,8,9 . All procedures were performed in the operating room under general anesthesia by the same cardiac surgeon (PP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those include revascularization of coronary and saphenous venous grafts by plaque debulking and thrombus removal in acute coronary syndromes, including acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina. This laser is applied as well for revascularization of peripheral obstructive atherosclerotic disease and for debulking of fibrotic tissue surrounding old pacemaker electrodes or internal defibrillator leads that need to be explanted [44].…”
Section: Tissue Effects Of Laser Energymentioning
confidence: 99%